SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 598

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS, (MADURAI BENCH)
V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
Minor. Eshaan Rep. by his mother & Guardian Preethi, Madurai – Petitioner
Versus
The Regional Passport Officer, Office of the Regional Passport Officer, Race Course Road, Madurai & Another – Respondents
W.P (MD) No. 22190 of 2023 & W.M.P (MD) No. 18483 of 2023
Decided On : 27-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: D. Shanmugaraja Sethupathi.
For the Respondents: M. Rajendran, N. Dilipkumar.

In divorce cases concerning minors, both parents' consent or court permission is required for passport issuance, emphasizing the need for mutual agreement or legal oversight.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition challenging the refusal to issue a passport to minor child due to lack of parental consent - The court must consider the ongoing divorce proceedings and custody issues before issuing a passport. (Paras 1, 7, 8)

(B) Passport Act - Guidelines stipulate both parents' consent or court permission for passport issuance when divorce and custody matters are pending - Petitioner's urgency deemed infructuous, given ongoing matrimonial disputes. (Paras 6, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a minor, seeks a passport for international competitions; however, consent from both parents is required due to ongoing custody disputes, and the mother has failed to comply with court orders for custodial access.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the refusal of the passport application, deeming the respondent's concerns regarding potential flight risk valid.

Issues: The main issues addressed were the requirement for both parents’ consent in passport issuance amidst custody disputes and the urgency claimed by the petitioner for international competition participation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the passport issuing authority's insistence on consent reinforced the need for both parents' agreement or court permission under the Passport Act's guidelines; urgency alone does not override this requirement.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for writ. (Para 1)
2. background of marriage and domestic issues. (Para 2 , 3)
3. arguments by the parties regarding custody and passport. (Para 4 , 5)
4. judicial observations on custody and passport issuing process. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. conclusion dismissing the writ petition. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned communication, dated 24.08.2023 issued by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to re-issue the passport to the minor petitioner Master.Eshaan in pursuance of the application vide File Number MD1075709750123, dated 23.08.2023.)

1. The Petitioner has prayed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned communication, dated 24.08.2023 issued by the first respondent and consequently, direct the respondent to re-issue the passport to the minor petitioner Master.Eshaan in pursuance of the application vide File Number MD1075709750123, dated 23.08.2023.

2. The case of the petitioner is that, Mrs.Preethi is the mother of the petitioner and the second respondent is the father of the petitioner. Their marriage was solemnized on 26.10.2015. Out of the wedlock, the petitioner was born on 13.09.2017. Subsequent to the marriage, the petitioner's mother was subjected to domestic violence and other harassment at the hands of her husband and his family members. On 02.03.2020, she was driven out from the matrimonial home. Thereafter, the second respondent has filed H.M.O.P.No. 110/2021 before the Family Court, Madurai seeking dissolution of marriage. Thereafter, the petitioner's mother filed H.M.O.P.No.286/2021 before the Family Court, Madurai seeking restitution of conjugal rights. When she was driven out from matrimonial home, all her belongings including certificates and her passport and passport of the petitioner were retained by her husband in the matrimonial home.

3. The petitioner has been studying 1st standard in a private school at Madurai. He has participated Regional Level Abacus Competition - Brainobrain Kids Academic Private Limited, Chennai and he won the silver medal. He has also participated in the 9th International Online Abacus Competition conducted by the Brainobrain Kids Academic Private Limited on 28.01.2023 and he acquired Championship. The 42nd India National Abacus Competition Festival is being scheduled on 9th and 10th of September 2023 at Trade Centre, Chennai. He has made an application to participate in the above National Level Competition. In addition, International Competition is scheduled to be held on 25.11.2023 at Dubai. He has been very interested in participating the Abacus International Competition Scheduled at Dubai. They have made all arrangements to fly abroad and participate in the event scheduled at Dubai. Under these circumstances, the petitioner's mother sent a letter, dated 09.01.2023 to the second respondent requesting to return back their passport. Since her husband has refused to hand over the passport, she has filed I.A.No.1 of 2023 in H.M.O.P.No.110 of 2021 before the Family Court, Madurai seeking direction to her husband to return the documents mentioned in the annexure including the passport. The Family Court Judge appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the cupboard situated at the matrimonial home and take the inventory of the things kept inside the cupboard and hand over the things to her. As per the order of the Family Court, the Advocate Commissioner had inspected the cupboard and took inventory of the things found in the cupboard. To the shock and surprise, only their old passports were found. Her new passport and her son's passport were not found in the cupboard. On enquiry, the second respondent informed that he did not know whereabouts of their passport. Hence, left with no other option, she has submitte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top