SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 614

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Kancheepuram – Respondents
Crl.O.P. No. 6709 of 2024
Decided on : 21-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :P. Ezhilnilavan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: S. Santhosh

IMPORTANT POINT
The court has the discretion to modify conditions imposed on petitioners and emphasized the importance of timely cross-examination of witnesses.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code - Modification of Cost for Witnesses - The court modified the condition imposed on the petitioner to pay Rs.5000/- for each witness, who were residents of Kancheepuram, to Rs.2000/- for each witness, and required the total amount to be deposited before a specified date. The court also specified that the witnesses should be cross-examined on the same day of their appearance, with a warning that failure to do so would result in the loss of the chance for further cross-examination.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to modify the order imposing Rs.5000/- for each witness passed by the trial court in a criminal case.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the condition of paying Rs.5000/- for each witness from Kancheepuram to be onerous and modified it to Rs.2000/- for each witness, with a requirement to deposit the total amount before a specified date. The court also specified the consequences of failing to cross-examine the witnesses on the same day of their appearance.

Issues: Modification of cost for witnesses, Cross-examination of witnesses

Ratio Decidendi: The court has the discretion to modify conditions imposed on petitioners, taking into account the circumstances and reasonableness of the conditions. The court also emphasized the importance of timely cross-examination of witnesses.

Final Decision: The condition imposing Rs.5000/- for each witness was modified to Rs.2000/- for each witness, with a requirement to deposit the total amount before a specified date. The petitioner was also warned that failure to cross-examine the witnesses on the same day of their appearance would result in the loss of the chance for further cross-examination.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, pleased to modify the order to the extent of imposing Rs.5000/- for each witness passed by the learned Special Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet in Crl.M.P.No.507 of 2024 in Special Case No.06 of 2014 dated 16.02.2024.)

1. The Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to modify the order to the extent of imposing Rs.5000/- for each witness passed by the learned Special Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet in Crl.M.P.No.507 of 2024 in Special Case No.06 of 2014 dated 16.02.2024.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though there had been a delay on the side of the petitioner/accused in recalling the witnesses, the trial Court was pleased to order a recall of witnesses, however, imposed a condition to pay a sum of Rs.5000/- to each witness i.e. PW2 to PW13. He further submitted that all the witnesses hail from Kancheepuram and in such circumstances, imposing a cost of Rs.5000/- for each witness is onerous and exorbitant. Thereby, he sought to modify the condition in respect of the cost alone.

3. He further submitted that all the witnesses are directed to appear before the trial Court on 15.04.2024, and the petitioner undertakes that he will cross examine all the witnesses on the same day of their appearance. He also submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.2000/- for each witness, thereby, he only seeks that the condition to pay Rs.5000/- to each witness may be modified.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the trial Court had allowed the petition seeking to recall the witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C. by imposing a cost of Rs.5000/- for each witness. He further submitted that the case in Special Case No.06 of 2014 stands posted on 15.04.2024. He also submitted that all the witnesses hail from Kancheepuram.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

6. A perusal of records shows that the trial Court, while allowing the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 311 Cr.P.C., seeking to recall the witnesses PW2 to PW13, had imposed a cost of Rs.5000/- to be paid for each witness, who hail from Kancheepuram. This Court is of the opinion that the condition imposed directing the petitioner to pay Rs.5000/- for each witness, who are residents of Kancheepuram, is onerous.

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands ordered and thereby, the condition is modified to the effect that each of the petitioner shall be paid with Rs.2000/- and the total amount shall be deposited before the trial Court on or before 01.04.2024.

8. It is made clear that the witnesses shall be cross examined by the petitioner on the same day of their appearance before the trial Court and if the petitioner fails to cross examine them, he shall lose the chance of cross examination and he shall not be afforded any further chance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top