IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
K. Srinivasan - Petitioner
Versus
The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Kancheepuram - Respondent
Crl. O.P. No. 6676 of 2024
Decided On : 20-03-2024
Criminal Procedure Code - Modification of Cost for Witnesses - The court modified the condition imposed by the trial court, reducing the cost to be paid for each witness from Rs.5000 to Rs.2000, and required the total amount to be deposited before a specified date. The petitioner was also directed to cross-examine the witnesses on the same day of their appearance, with a warning that failure to do so would result in the loss of the chance for further cross-examination.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to modify the order of the trial court, which imposed a cost of Rs.5000 for each witness (PW2 to PW11) from Kancheepuram, who were to be recalled for cross-examination in a criminal case.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the imposed cost of Rs.5000 for each witness from Kancheepuram to be onerous and modified the condition, reducing the cost to Rs.2000 for each witness and requiring the total amount to be deposited before a specified date. The petitioner was also directed to cross-examine the witnesses on the same day of their appearance, with a warning that failure to do so would result in the loss of the chance for further cross-examination.
Issues: Modification of cost for witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the onerous nature of the imposed cost and modified it to a more reasonable amount, while also imposing a requirement for timely cross-examination of the witnesses.
Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition stands ordered, modifying the condition to require the petitioner to pay Rs.2000 for each witness and deposit the total amount before a specified date. The petitioner was also directed to cross-examine the witnesses on the same day of their appearance, with a warning that failure to do so would result in the loss of the chance for further cross-examination.
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, pleased to modify the order to the extent of imposing Rs.5000/- for each witness passed by the learned Special Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet in Crl.M.P.No.05 of 2024 in Special Case No.10 of 2014 dated 20.02.2024.)
1. The Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to modify the order to the extent of imposing Rs.5000/- for each witness passed by the learned Special Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet in Crl.M.P.No.05 of 2024 in Special Case No.10 of 2014 dated 20.02.2024.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though there had been a delay on the side of the petitioner/accused in recalling the witnesses, the trial Court was pleased to order a recall of witnesses, however, imposed a condition to pay a sum of Rs.5000/- to each witness i.e. PW2 to PW11. He further submitted that all the witnesses hail from Kancheepuram and in such circumstances, imposing a cost of Rs.5000/- for each witness is onerous and exorbitant. Thereby, he sought to modify the condition in respect of the cost alone.
3. He further submitted that all the witnesses are directed to appear before the trial Court on 10.04.2024, and the petitioner undertakes that he will cross examine all the witnesses on the same day of their appearance. He also submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.2000/- for each witness, thereby, he only seeks that the condition to pay Rs.5000/- to each witness may be modified.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the trial Court had allowed the petition seeking to recall the witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C. by imposing a cost of Rs.5000/- for each witness. He further submitted that the case in Special Case No.10 of 2014 stands posted on 10.04.2024. He also submitted that all the witnesses hail from Kancheepuram.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.
6. A perusal of records shows that the trial Court, while allowing the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 311 Cr.P.C., seeking to recall the witnesses PW2 to PW11, had imposed a cost of Rs.5000/- to be paid for each witness, who hail from Kancheepuram. This Court is of the opinion that the condition imposed directing the petitioner to pay Rs.5000/- for each witness, who are residents of Kanchipuram, is onerous.
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands ordered and thereby, the condition is modified to the effect that each of the petitioner shall be paid with Rs.2000/- and the total amount shall be deposited before the trial Court on or before 01.04.2024.
8. It is made clear that the witnesses shall be cross examined by the petitioner on the same day of their appearance before the trial Court and if the petitioner fails to cross examine them, he shall lose the chance of cross examination and he shall not be afforded any further chance.
AI
The court has the discretion to modify conditions imposed by the trial court, considering the reasonableness and practicality of such conditions, and may impose additional requirements to ensure time....
The court has the discretion to modify conditions imposed on petitioners and emphasized the importance of timely cross-examination of witnesses.
Judicial discretion in modifying costs for witness recall reflects fairness in legal proceedings.
Imposing onerous and unaffordable costs on the accused for recalling witnesses is akin to denial of justice and requires interference in the interest of justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.