IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. SUBRAMANIAN, R. SAKTHIVEL, JJ.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Venkatesh Ramanathan and Others – Respondents
C.M.A. No. 1713 of 2020, C.M.P. No. 13503 of 2020
Decided On : 15-03-2024
Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - 173 - 2020 (1) TN MAC 182 - The court discussed the quantum of compensation awarded for the death of an individual in a motor accident, considering the loss of income and dependency. The judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Birender and Others, 2020 (1) TN MAC 182 was referenced to determine the inclusion of family pension in the calculation of loss of dependency. The court concluded that the pension drawn by the deceased can form the basis for the determination of compensation for loss of dependency.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a motor accident resulting in the death of an individual. The claimants sought compensation, while the Insurance Company contested the claim, arguing that the accident did not happen as suggested by the claimants and that the quantum of compensation claimed was excessive.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the evidence and concluded that the pension could be taken as the loss of income for the family. It deducted personal expenses of the deceased and fixed the monthly loss of dependency. The court referenced the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court to justify the inclusion of the pension in the calculation of loss of dependency.
Issues: The main issue was the determination of the quantum of compensation for the death of the individual in the motor accident, considering the loss of income and dependency.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court to establish that the pension drawn by the deceased can form the basis for the determination of compensation for loss of dependency.
Final Decision: The appeal by the Insurance Company was dismissed, and no costs were awarded. The court concluded that the pension drawn by the deceased can form the basis for the determination of compensation for loss of dependency.
JUDGMENT :
R. SUBRAMANIAN, J.
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the award and decreetal order dated 22.11.2019 made in MCOP No. 139 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub-ordinate Judge Court, Rasipuram.
1. The appeal is by the Insurance Company. Challenge is to the quantum of compensation awarded at Rs. 18,22,040/- for the death of one Ponnusamy in a motor accident that took place on 22.12.2013 at about 3.30 p.m. on the Salem - Namakkal road near Thalampallam bus stop.
2. It is the case of the claimants that while the deceased was riding in his motor cycle to cross the road, the car bearing Registration No. KA-51-Z-8370 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner hit the deceased and caused the accident. The deceased sustained grievous injuries and died on the spot. It was contended that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the car. The claimants sought for a compensation at Rs. 20,00,000/-. The quantum was sought to be justified by claiming that the deceased was a retired Bank staff and working as a Manager in Muthoot Finance, Tharamangalam Branch and earning a sum of Rs. 25,000/- per month.
3. The Insurance Company resisted the claim contending that the accident did not happen in the manner suggested by the claimants and there was no negligence on the part of the rider of the car. According to the Insurance Company, it is the deceased who suddenly crossed the road and invited the accident. On the quantum of compensation claimed, it was contended by the Insurance Company that since the wife of the deceased is being paid family pension, there is no monetary loss and therefore, the quantum of compensation claimed is excessive.
4. Before the Tribunal, Ravikumar, the 3rd claimant was examined as PW-1 and two other witnesses were examined. The respondents did not let in any evidence. The First Information Report was marked as Ex.P1 and copy of the pension order was marked as Ex.P15. The deceased was admittedly aged about 62 years at the time of the accident and was a retired Bank employee drawing pension.
5. The Tribunal, on a consideration of the evidence before it, concluded that the pension could be taken as the loss of income for the family. It deducted 1/4 for the personal expenses of the deceased and fixed the monthly loss of dependency at Rs. 20,560/-. Applying multiplier of 7, the Tribunal arrived at the total loss of income at Rs. 17,27,040/-. The Tribunal granted a sum of Rs. 15,000/- each for funeral expenses and loss of estate and a sum of Rs. 40,000/- and Rs. 25,000/- respectively for loss of consortium and loss of spouse. Aggrieved by the award, the Insurance Company is on appeal.
6. We have heard Mr. N. Somasundar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Ma. P. Thangavel, learned counsel for the respondents 2 to 5.
7. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that though the claimants had alleged that the deceased was working in Muthoot Finance on the salary of Rs. 25,000/- the same has not been proved by any evidence worth consideration. On the decision of the Tribunal to took pension as the basis for loss of dependency, the learned counsel would invite our attention to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Birender and Others, 2020 (1) TN MAC 182 wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had considered the question as to whether the family pension that is drawn by an employee at the time of her death could be added to her salary and taken as a loss of dependency. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Para 21 of the said judgment concluded that the addition of that Rs. 7,000/- family pension to the income of the deceased made by the High Court is not justified. The Hon'ble Supreme Court approved the reasoning of the Tribunal for not including the family pension drawn by the wife of the deceased as the determining factor for calculating loss of dependency.
The pension drawn by the deceased can form the basis for the determination of compensation for loss of dependency.
Pension income constitutes a loss in dependency claims and must be compensated irrespective of family pension received by heirs.
The court established that multiplier for compensation depends on the accurate assessment of the deceased's age and clarified that family pension cannot be included as income for loss of dependency.
Compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act must reflect just compensation for losses, including reliance on established principles regarding earnings and pensions without deductions for pensio....
Compensation under the Motor Vehicle Act addresses pecuniary losses due to death, independent of pensions, emphasizing appropriate evidence and loss assessment.
Compensation for death in motor vehicle accidents under the Motor Vehicles Act cannot be reduced by pension or insurance benefits, as these are not directly linked to the accident, and the principle ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.