IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
J. Thenmozhi - Petitioner
Versus
The Director of School Education, Chennai & Others - Respondents
W.P. No. 6591 of 2024
Decided On : 15-03-2024
Mandamus - Arrears of Salary - The court directed the fourth respondent to submit a proposal seeking arrears of salary from the date of the petitioner's original promotion to the post of P.G. Assistant (Botany) on 07.06.2017, and the second and third respondents to disburse the arrears of salary within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to disburse the arrears of salary and other consequential benefits. The petitioner was promoted to the post of P.G. Assistant (Botany) in a school, and despite the approval of her promotion, the arrears of salary were not considered for her.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the fourth respondent to submit a proposal seeking arrears of salary from the date of the petitioner's original promotion, and the second and third respondents to disburse the arrears of salary within a period of eight weeks thereafter. The court disposed of the writ petition with this direction.
Issues: Disbursement of arrears of salary and other consequential benefits to the petitioner following her promotion to the post of P.G. Assistant (Botany).
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the fourth respondent must submit a proposal seeking arrears of salary from the date of the petitioner's original promotion, and the second and third respondents must disburse the arrears of salary within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
Final Decision: The court directed the fourth respondent to submit a proposal seeking arrears of salary from the date of the petitioner's original promotion, and the second and third respondents to disburse the arrears of salary within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to disburse the arrears of salary and all other consequential benefit to the petitioner from 07.06.2017 to 31.05.2023, in view of approval of petitioner's promotion as P.G. Assistant (Botany) in the 4th respondent School, vide proceedings of the 2nd respondent, in Na.Ka.No.3593/A2/2021, dated 09.05.2023, within a time frame.)
1. This Writ Petition has been filed for a direction directing the respondents to disburse the arrears of salary and other consequential benefits.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and perused the materials available on record.
3. The petitioner was appointed as B.T. Assistant in the fourth respondent School on 05.10.1993 in the sanctioned post. Her appointment was also duly approved by the fourth respondent. After completion of ten years of her service, she was granted Selection Grade and after completion of twenty years, she was granted Special Grade. The fourth respondent School is an aided Religious Minority Institution and it is governed by the provisions of Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools Regulations Act & Rules, 1973. While being so, a vacancy arose for the post of P.G. Assistant (Botany), due to retirement of earlier incumbent, viz., C. Sundaravadana, on 31.05.2016. Therefore, the fourth respondent School promoted the petitioner to the post of P.G. Assistant (Botany) and she had joined duty on 07.06.2017.
4. Pursuant to her promotion, the fourth respondent submitted a proposal for approval of appointment of the petitioner as P.G. Assistant (Botany) before the third respondent. However, the third respondent did not pass any orders. Therefore, the petitioner approached this Court by way of writ petition in W.P.No.23458 of 2021 and this Court, by an order dated 05.01.2023, directed the respondents to pass suitable orders on the proposal submitted by the fourth respondent seeking approval of her promotion to the post of P.G. Assistant (Botany) with effect from 07.06.2017. Thereafter, her appointment was approved by an order dated 09.05.2023 with effect from 07.06.2017. She was due for superannuation on 31.12.2022, since her superannuation falls in the middle of the academic year, she was permitted to work till 31.05.2023 and she was relieved from service on the same day. Despite the approval of her promotion of P.G. Assistant (Botany) with effect from 07.06.2017, the said period was not considered for her salary to the post of P.G. Assistant (Botany).
5. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 submitted that so far no proposal has been received from the fourth respondent to consider the request made by the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the fourth respondent is directed to sent a necessary proposal seeking arrears of salary from the date of the petitioner's original promotion to the post of P.G. Assistant (Botany) on 07.06.2017. On receipt of the same, the second and third respondents are directed to disburse the arrears of salary within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
The duty of the respondent school to fill vacant posts without delay and the importance of remedying any situation resulting in the delay of teachers' service conditions.
Promotions should be based on merit and ability, with seniority being considered only when merit and ability are approximately equal, as per Rule 15(4) of the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (R....
State authorities must ensure parity in salary disbursement when an employee is similarly situated to others who have already been granted financial arrears under a valid government order, especially....
The court directed authorities to consider the petitioner's grievance regarding salary arrears for an approved service period, emphasizing the principle of parity with similarly situated employees un....
Court directs competent authority to consider and regularize teacher's promotion as Headmistress on merits after hearing parties.
The court directed the authorities to consider a claim for salary arrears based on parity with similarly placed employees covered under a government order promulgated as a consequence of previous jud....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.