SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 829

P. B. BALAJI
Meerabai – Appellant
Versus
V. Gnanamani – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:R. Udayakumar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Dr. C. Ravichandran, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to allow the Second Appeal and set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S. No.24 of 2014 dated 29.07.2015 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Tiruttani confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S. No.198 of 2011 dated 08.07.2014 on the file of District Munsiff Court, Tiruttani.)

1. The plaintiff who suffered concurrent findings before the Courts below is the appellant.

2. The parties are described as per their litigative status before the trial Court.

3. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit property was purchased by the plaintiff under a sale deed dated 27.09.1972 and thereafter, she has been in possession and enjoyment of the suit property measuring 53 cents and paying kist for the suit property. According to the plaintiff, the total extent in the Survey No.136/4 was 2.33 acres and the same has been subdivided into 136/4A, 136/4B and 136/4C and the suit property was assigned S.F.No.136/4C. The plaintiff came to know that patta had been issued to the second defendant in respect of suit property and taking advantage of the same, the defendants attempted to trespass into the suit propert

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top