SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3347

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
S.Vadivel Murugan - Petitioner
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Highways Department and ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD)No.24679 of 2023
Decided On : 12-10-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.S.Arunnithy
For the Respondent: Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar, Additional Government Pleader

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that the State has a constitutional duty to protect public lands and the rights of citizens against encroachments, and that proper procedures must be followed to address such issues effectively.

Headnote:

ENCROACHMENT - Writ of Mandamus - Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Tamil Nadu State Highways Act, 2001 - The court emphasized the constitutional duty of the State to protect public properties and the rights of citizens against encroachments. It highlighted the importance of following statutory procedures for eviction and the establishment of monitoring committees to address grievances related to encroachments. The court directed the authorities to act promptly on representations regarding encroachments and to ensure that the rights of citizens are upheld.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus to direct the authorities to consider his representation regarding the removal of encroachments on State Highways land that obstructed access to his property, which he had legally purchased and resided on for five years.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that numerous petitions regarding encroachments were not being adequately addressed by the authorities, leading to a backlog of cases. It recognized the need for a structured approach to handle such grievances and emphasized the importance of the committees established by the government to monitor and act on encroachments.

Issues: Whether the authorities were obligated to consider the petitioner's representation regarding encroachments and what procedures should be followed to address such issues effectively.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the right to property is a constitutional right under Article 300 A of the Constitution of India, and the State has a duty to protect this right. It emphasized the necessity of exhausting alternative remedies before approaching the court and the importance of statutory procedures in addressing encroachments.

Final Decision: The court directed the relevant authorities to consider the petitioner's representation and take appropriate actions to remove the encroachments within a specified timeframe, while also establishing a framework for handling future complaints regarding encroachments.

ORDER :

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 31.08.2023 and remove the encroachment in Survey No.350 situated in Eriyodu Village, Vedasandur Taluk and pass order within the stipulated period as fixed by this Court.

The lis on hand has been instituted to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner dated 31.08.2023 and to remove the encroachment in Survey No.350 situated at Eriyodu Village, Vedasandur Taluk.

2.The petitioner states that he had purchased the land in Survey No.352/1A2 to an extent of 2.43 Ares at Eriyodu Village, Vedasandur Taluk in the year 2017 and the same was registered vide Document No.2584 / 2017 on the file of the Sub Registrar, Vada Madurai. Patta also stands in the name of the petitioner. The petitioner constructed a residential house and residing there for the past 5 years without any hindrance. On the eastern side of the land belonging to the petitioner, the State Highways Road is situated in Survey No.350 and the respondents 4 and 5 have encroached upon the State Highways land, thereby preventing ingress and egress of the petitioner to reach the road.

3.Numerous petitions have been instituted by the aggrieved persons to remove the encroachments in State Highways Roads, water bodies and in public streets. Such representations are not seriously considered by the competent authorities, which result in filing of the Writ Petitions before the High Court, seeking a direction to remove the encroachments. Such Writ Petitions are mounting and we are of the opinion that the Government Orders issued for eviction of encroachments have not been followed, despite the fact that the procedures are contemplated under the statutes and rules in force.

4.The Government originally issued G.O.(Ms)No.540, Revenue [LD6(2)] Department, dated 04.12.2014 and formed committees to dispose of the grievances relating to the eviction of encroachment in Government lands. The said Government Order was issued pursuant to the order of the High Court of Madras in W.P.No.26722 of 2013 dated 08.10.2014. Subsequently, the Division Bench of Madras High Court at Madurai Bench in W.P.(MD)No.15917 of 2015, dated 02.09.2015 passed an order. Superseding earlier Government Order issued in G.O.(Ms)No.540, recently, the Government issued G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, 'LD.6(2)' Section, dated 08.02.2022. Monitoring Committees are constituted. The Divisional Monitoring Committee has been constituted appointing Revenue Divisional Officer concerned as Chairperson / Convenor along with members. The District Monitoring Committee has been constituted appointing District Collector concerned as Chairperson along with members. The State Steering Committee is constituted headed by the Chief Secretary to Government along with members from various departments including Police and Highways Department. The Committee will convene once in a month and the issues will be taken up for discussion along with all Secretaries Meeting. The Committees constituted by the Government are expected to act in a meaningful manner, so as to redress the grievance of the aggrieved persons sending representations to remove the encroachments from Highways, water bodies and Government Poramboke lands etc.

5.Writ petitions filed challenging the show cause notices are not entertainable, unless such show cause notices have been issued by an incompetent authority having no jurisdiction or tainted with the allegation of mala fides. Persons, receiving show cause notices regarding removal of encroachments, are at liberty to submit their objections / explanations along with the documents, if any, enabling the competent authority to decide the issues on merits and in accordance with law and proceed thereafter.

6.If any person is aggrieved by the

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top