P. B. BALAJI
Mahaveer Hemanth Bhandhari and Sons – Appellant
Versus
P. Srinivasalu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
Prayer : Second Appeal under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Chengalpattu dated 31.01.2019 in A.S.No.14 of 2011 confirming the judgment and decree of the Principal Subordinate Court at Chengalpattu dated 30.09.2010 in O.S.No.141 of 2007.
The defendants 2 and 3 in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 19.12.2006 are the appellants in the present Second Appeal.
2. The parties are described as per their litigative status before the trial Court. The case of the plaintiff is that on 19.12.2006, he entered into an unregistered sale agreement with the defendants 1 to 3. The sale consideration mutually fixed was Rs.4,00,000/- and on the date of the execution of the sale agreement, a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- was paid as advance. According to the plaintiff, the sale agreement permitted the plaintiff to take possession of the property, fence the same and also form a layout for marketing the plots. The parties have agreed for 90 days period for concluding the sale transaction. According to the plaintiff, he was also ready and willing to pay the bala
Arumugam Vs. Natarajan and another
Besto Brite Steels Pvt Ltd., Vs. V.Muthu Krishnan
Citadel Fine Pharmaceuticals Vs. Ramaniyam Real Estates Pvt.Ltd., and another
I.S.Sikandar (D) by LRs Vs. K.Subramani and Others
Jayalakshmi Ammal and Others Vs. Chinnasamy Gounder and another
S.Sarojini and another Vs. P.Mariappan and another
Sak Apparels Vs. Madras Management Association and Others
T.R.Murugesan Vs. S.Balakrishnan and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.