ORDER :

(S. Sounthar, J.) :

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.30 of 2017 dated 02.01.2024 of the learned Sub-Ordinate Judge, Thiruchengode.)

The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of Advocate Commissioner to determine the age of the promissory note and the revenue stamp affixed thereon.

2. The respondent herein filed a suit for recovery of money based on promissory note. The petitioner, who was arrayed as defendant filed a written statement denying the execution of promissory note. It was his case that suit promissory note was executed as a security for one Subramaniam and there was no transaction between the petitioner and respondent. The petitioner filed an application in I.A.No.1 of 2019 seeking appointment of Advocate Commissioner to send the questioned promissory note dated 09.03.2016 to Nasik Mintz Factory for the purpose of ascertaining the age of the promissory note paper and also the age of the revenue stamp affixed thereon.

3. This Court in C.R.P(P