Velineni Veeraiah vs Nallabothula Mohan Kumar Dharma

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(AP) 1315

BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
Velineni Veeraiah – Appellant
Versus
Nallabothula Mohan Kumar Dharma – Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the 1st petitioner/defendant under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the orders passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Chirala in I.A.No.134 of 2014 in O.S.No.74 of 2009 dtd. 12/8/2014 where in and whereby learned trial Judge dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner No.1 under Sec. 45 of Indian Evidence Act and refused to send suit promissory note to Hand writing expert Mr.Ashok Kashyap for comparison of age of ink.

2. The case of petitioner No.1/Defendant No.1 before the Trial Court in brief is that respondent has filed suit against him basing on promissory note. He submits that respondent has examined PWs 1 and 2 and his evidence was closed and thereafter suit was coming for his side evidence. As he pleaded in his written statement that PW2 was running Finance Company at Chirala and one Katta Suri Babu, who is working as IV-Class employee in V.S.R and Y.R.N.College approached Finance Company for a loan to meet publication expenses of the book, for which PW2 insisted the said Suri Babu to get third party surety and thereafter at the request of said Suri Babu he stood as surety and PW2 advanced Rs.40, 000.00 to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document