IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
Manorama Vijayan – Appellant
Versus
U.Ramprasad Menon @ U.R.Prasad - Respondent
Application No.2297 of 2024 in T.O.S.No.24 of 2021
Decided on : 14-06-2024
COURT FEES - TESTAMENTARY ORIGINAL SUIT - Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Sections 55, 57, 59, 64, 11 - The court discussed the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, particularly Sections 55 and 59, which mandate the valuation of an estate for court fee purposes. The court emphasized the necessity for the Collector to ascertain the estate's value and the implications of under-valuation on court fees. The interpretation of these sections influenced the court's decision to direct the Collector to conduct an inquiry into the estate's valuation, ensuring compliance with the statutory requirements while allowing the trial to proceed.
Fact of the Case:
The first defendant in a testamentary original suit filed an application requesting the court to direct the Collector to ascertain the valuation of the deceased Valsala Menon's estate, arguing that the estate was grossly undervalued by the plaintiff, who had paid insufficient court fees based on this valuation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found merit in the first defendant's claim regarding the undervaluation of the estate. It recognized the need for the Collector to assess the estate's value and the implications of this valuation on the court fees payable by the plaintiff. The court also noted the importance of protecting the interests of both parties and the state in recovering due revenue.
Issues: Whether the valuation of the estate was accurate and whether the plaintiff had paid the appropriate court fees based on that valuation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that under the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, the valuation of the estate must be ascertained by the Collector, and the plaintiff is required to pay court fees based on this valuation. The court emphasized that the conversion of an original petition into a testamentary original suit necessitates a reassessment of court fees based on the Collector's findings.
Final Decision: The court directed the Collector to ascertain the estate's valuation and submit findings within four weeks, allowing the plaintiff to proceed with the trial while making it clear that further court fees may be required based on the Collector's valuation.
ORDER :
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
Prayer: Application has been filed under Order XIV Rule 8 read with Section 59 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 to direct the Collector to ascertain valuation of the estate of the deceased Valsala Menon and to direct the plaintiff to pay ad valorem Court Fee on the value so ascertained as per the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955.
The present application has been taken out by the first defendant in the testamentary original suit, seeking a direction to the Collector to ascertain the valuation of the estate of the Testatrix deceased Valsala Menon and to direct the plaintiff to pay ad valorem Court Fee on the value so ascertained in terms of the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955.
2. I have heard Mrs.Mehek Ashrani, learned counsel for the applicant/1st defendant and Mrs.Chitra Sampath, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.K.Gowtham Kumar, counsel for the first respondent/plaintiff.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant/1st defendant, Mrs.Mehek Ashrani would submit that the huge and valuable estate of the deceased has been grossly under valued at Rs.7,05,20,000/-. According to the applicant/1st defendant, the value of the estate would be approximately Rs.75,00,00,000/- and hence, the plaintiff has to be called upon to pay proper court fee upon the estate being valued by the Collector.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant/1st defendant would further submit that the court fee paid by the plaintiff post conversion of the Original Petition into a testamentary original suit is also not in line with the proviso to Article 11(k) of Schedule II of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955.
5. Per contra, learned Senior Counsel Mrs.Chitra Sampath, appearing for the the 1st respondent/plaintiff would submit that the plaintiff has never shied away from paying the court fee and the apprehensions of the applicant/1st defendant are baseless. Learned Senior Counsel would place reliance on Section 57 of Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and state that the said provision fully protects the applicant/1st defendant and as and when the Collector ascertains the market value and if it is found that any further court fee is payable, the plaintiff is always willing to pay the same.
6. The learned counsel for the applicant/1st defendant would place reliance on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of R.Ramachandran vs G.Hariharan reported in 2001 (2) L.W. 318. In fact, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent/plaintiff also places reliance on the very same decision to fortify her contention that the issue of Court fee relates to the petitioner in the Original Petition and the revenue.
7. The learned counsel for the applicant/1st defendant would also place reliance on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of K.Vasudevan and other vs K.Rangarajan and others (O.S.A No.26 of 2019 dated 06.03.2019), where the Hon'ble Division Bench has held that when a petition for Probate or Letters of Administration gets converted into a Testamentary Original Suit, the applicant is required to pay the valuation fixed by the Collector mandatorily. The Hon'ble Division Bench has made it clear that once the Original Petition gets converted into a Testamentary Original Suit, the Registry will have to issue notices asking the applicant to pay the requisite Court fee on the valuation fixed by the District Collector. The Hon'ble Division Bench also held that Order XXV Rules 59 and 60 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules will have to be complied with.
8. With regard to the submission of the learned Senior Counsel inviting my attention to Section 57 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, it is to be borne in mind that the said provision is incorporated under Chapter VI of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, which deals with
The court established that the valuation of an estate in testamentary matters must be determined by the Collector, and the court fees payable are contingent upon this valuation, ensuring compliance w....
Court fees determination for testamentary matters follows the Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act and is primarily governed by the procedure involving the Collector, distinguishing it from civil suits and ensu....
The court affirmed the distinction between court fee assessments for testamentary suits versus civil suits, placing valuation authority with the Collector as per specific statutory provisions.
Section 55 of Court Fees Act mandates that every application for probate or letters of administration is to be accompanied by a valuation of estate in the form set forth in Part-1 of schedule III of ....
An appeal against the Master’s order regarding court fees is not maintainable as per Order XIV Rule 12 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, 1994.
The suit must be valued in terms of the Act in force when it was instituted, and the market value of the suit property must be reckoned prima facie at the guideline value fixed by the authorities con....
In suits for declaration without consequential relief, court fees must be calculated based on the market value of the property as of the date of plaint presentation, not the value stated in the docum....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following the prescribed procedure for determining the valuation of the Suit and the payment of court fees, as per the provisions....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.