Back
R. SUBRAMANIAN, R. SAKTHIVEL
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board – Appellant
Versus
Chennai Water Desalination Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. SUBRAMANIAN, J.
Prayer: Original Side Appeal (CAD) filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read with Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent and Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act 2015, to set aside the Judgment and decreetal order dated 26.07.2022 bearing OP No. 298 of 2022 passed by this Hon'ble Court in its entirety.
1. The instant Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is against the order of the learned Single Judge made in a proceeding under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2. The background facts are as follows:
A request for arbitration can be made informally, and claims for damages do not crystallize into debts until adjudicated, impacting the rights related to bank guarantees.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of limitation principles under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to determine the timeliness of the counter claim and the reject....
The acknowledgment of liability extends the limitation period for claims, while counterclaims not acknowledged are barred by limitation.
The appeal was allowed, reinstating the arbitrator's award which concluded that the termination of the contract was illegal due to failure in fulfilling mutual obligations concerning site availabilit....
Wrongful encashment of a bank guarantee can be claimed as restitution rather than strictly under damages, highlighting the sufficiency of entitlement rather than extensive evidence. This determinatio....
The court affirmed that a performance security cannot be withheld post-acknowledgment of contract performance, and interim relief must balance equities in arbitration under Section 17 of the Act.
The limitation period for arbitration claims commences from the date of the Cure Notice, and claims not filed within three years are barred, affirming the arbitrator's findings.
The encashment of a performance bank guarantee does not require proof of loss, but must comply with the contract's terms; failure to evaluate these terms constitutes patent illegality.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
