S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, V. SIVAGNANAM
Suresh – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary to Government – Respondent
ORDER :
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 27.03.2024 in B3/D.O.No.29/2024 against the detenue Suresh, Male aged 25 years, S/o.Ratnaram, who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenue before this Court and set him at liberty.
The preventive detention order passed by the second respondent is under challenge in the present Habeas Corpus Petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of Detention passed by the Detaining Authority is vitiated as there is a variation in the English Version and Tamil Version of the ground of detention. It is therefore stated that the detenue is deprived of his valuable right to make effective representation.
4. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the impro
''Powanammal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu'' reported in ''(1999) 2 SCC 413
The court established that effective representation requires documents to be provided in a language understood by the detenue, as per Article 22(5).
The court established that effective representation requires documents to be provided in a language understood by the detenue, as per Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
The court established that effective representation requires proper translation of detention grounds, as per Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
The court established that effective representation requires documents to be provided in a language understood by the detenue, as per Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
The court established that proper translation of detention grounds is essential for the detenue's right to effective representation, as mandated by Article 22(5).
The court established that the right to effective representation in preventive detention cases includes the provision of documents in a language understood by the detenue.
The court established that the right to make an effective representation against detention includes the provision of documents in a language understood by the detenu.
The court established that effective representation requires documents to be provided in a language understood by the detenue, as mandated by Article 22(5).
The court established that effective representation against detention orders requires documents to be provided in a language understood by the detenu, as mandated by Article 22(5).
The court established that effective representation in preventive detention cases requires documents to be provided in a language understood by the detenue.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.