ORDER :

S.M. Subramaniam, J.

[PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records of the 2nd respondent, in his proceedings S.C.No.429/BCDFGISSSV/2024 dated 29.04.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to produce petitioner's husband (Kumar aged 42 years son of Subramani) before this Court now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal set him at liberty.]

The preventive detention order passed by the second respondent is under challenge in the present Habeas Corpus Petition.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of Detention passed by the Detaining Authority is vitiated as the copy of the grounds of detention has not been properly translated in English. It is therefore stated that the detenue is deprived of his valuable right to make effective representation.

4. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the improper translation of the copy of the vital document relied upon by the D