SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1272

R. SAKTHIVEL
V. Ravikumar – Appellant
Versus
Amutha – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Parthasarathy.
For the Respondent: K.M.S. Muthukumaran.

JUDGMENT :

R. SAKTHIVEL, J.

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(u) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, praying to set aside the fair and decretal order passed in C.M.A. No. 1 of 2015 dated 11.11.2021 by the learned District Judge, Nagapattinam reversing the fair and decretal order passed in H.M.O.P. No. 71 of 2020 dated 26.11.2014 by the learned Sub Judge, Nagapattinam and allow the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

1. Feeling aggrieved with the judgment dated November 11, 2021 passed in C.M.A. No. 1 of 2015 by the 'learned District Judge, Nagapattinam' [henceforth 'First Appellate Court' for brevity] reversing the fair and decretal order dated November 26, 2014 passed in H.M.O.P. No. 71 of 2020 by the 'learned Sub Judge, Nagapattinam' [henceforth 'Trial Court' for brevity] the appellant – husband filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein will be referred to as per their rank before the Trial Court.

Petitioner's case

3. The petitioner is the husband, and the respondent herein is the wife. According to the petitioner, the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent took place on August 31, 2007 as per Hindu R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top