SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1343

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Thamilarasan – Appellant
Versus
Director of Elementary Education, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: S. Viji, S. Deenadhayalan.
For the Respondents: T. Amjad Khan, K. Ragatheesh Kumar.

ORDER :

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent herein in pursuant to the impugned order in Na.KA.No. 00765/Aa1/2016 dated 05.04.2016 and quash the same and directing the second respondent to give B.T. Assistant promotion to the petitioner in the light of the judgment reported in 2012 (5) CTC 129 (R. Thirunavukkarasu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others).

1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous, since the petitioner has been promoted subsequent to the filing of this Writ Petition. Therefore, the relief sought for in this writ petition has been achieved.

2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top