Back
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
V. Arul Prakasam – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Ramanathapuram – Respondent
ORDER :
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents and 2 to conduct an enquiry regarding the production of bogus certificate by the third respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2016 and initiate an appropriate legal proceedings against the third respondent who got an appointment illegally.
1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this Writ Petition has now become infructuous since the third respondent has retired from service. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.
2. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
A writ petition under Article 226 becomes infructuous when the relief sought is no longer relevant or necessary.
Legal proceedings must address current and relevant issues; if an issue becomes moot, the court will dismiss the case.
A writ petition under Article 226 becomes infructuous if the respondent party dies, eliminating the basis for the action sought.
A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable if the relief sought has become infructuous.
A writ petition becomes infructuous when the circumstances change post-filing, such as the retirement of the challenged party and the promotion of the petitioner.
A petitioner has the right to withdraw a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, leading to its dismissal without further examination.
A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous when the issues presented no longer require resolution, aligning with the principles of judicial efficiency.
A writ petition under Article 226 can be withdrawn if the circumstances surrounding the case change, making the petition moot.
A writ petition is rendered infructuous when the circumstances surrounding the request for relief change, making it impossible to grant the requested relief.
A writ petition under Article 226 becomes infructuous when the relief sought has already been granted, negating the need for judicial intervention.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
