Back
D. KRISHNAKUMAR, KUMARESH BABU
M. Balasubramanian – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
D. KRISHNAKUMAR, A.C.J.
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 17.08.2022 in W.P. No. 26951 of 2015.
1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the writ court in W.P. No. 26951 of 2015, dated 17.08.2022, the present writ appeal has been filed by the appellant.
Brief Facts:
2. The appellants father M. Murugan was working as Tamil Teacher in Government Higher Secondary School and died on 22.09.1997 while he was in service. The appellant made an application to the 3rd respondent seeking appointment on compassionate grounds on 30.03.1999 with all relevant documents. The said application was not considered by the authorities and the same was rejected after 14 years by proceedings dated 07.05.2013. Challenging the said proceedings, the appellant had filed a writ petition in W.P. No. 20430 of 2013 before this Court and by order dated 08.09.2014, the said writ petition was disposed of directing the respondent-authorities to reconsider the case of the appellant and pass suitable orders. Pursuant to the said orders of this Court, the respondent had passed orders dated 12.01.2015 and again rejected the claim of the petitioner. Challenging the sa
Compassionate appointment applications must be processed timely, and age eligibility should consider circumstances where applicants reach the required age within the application period.
Compassionate appointment is intended for immediate relief in case of death of a breadwinner, and applications must be timely; delays undermine claims for such appointments.
Compassionate appointment must adhere to the prescribed regulations, and the purpose is to provide immediate financial assistance to the family of the deceased employee.
Compassionate appointments must adhere to strict timelines and cannot be claimed as a right, emphasizing the need for timely applications to address immediate financial crises.
Compassionate appointment is not a right and can only be granted under exceptional circumstances, as per the legal provisions and principles discussed by the court.
Compassionate appointment claims must be made promptly; significant delays undermine eligibility and the purpose of immediate relief.
Compassionate appointment is an exception and a concession, not a right, and should be made strictly in accordance with the rules. Long delays can lead to the rejection of compassionate appointments.
Compassionate appointment claims must be filed within stipulated timelines; delay undermines the purpose of relief intended for immediate financial distress and is not a vested right.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
