Back
D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Sundararajan – Appellant
Versus
Pushparani – Respondent
ORDER :
(D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.) :
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.04.2024 in E.A.No.14 of 2023 in E.P.No.26 of 2014 in O.S.No.382 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram pending disposal of the above civil revision petition.)
This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 22.04.2024 made in E.A.No.14 of 2023 in E.P.No.26 of 2014 in O.S.No. 382 of 2006 passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram.
2. The said Interlocutory Application is filed by the judgment-debtor under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure to declare that the decree is inexecutable.
3. Heard Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.M.Mohanaraj, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.
4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner taking this Court to the plaint filed in the present suit, especially to paragraph No. 3 would point out that in the plaint, even though it is pleaded that there was a total extent of 18 cents and the predecessor of the judgm
Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not permit re-litigation of issues already resolved in prior proceedings.
An ex parte decree that is cryptic and non-compliant with procedural requirements cannot be executed; necessary amendments to parties and relief sought must be pursued to validate execution.
Point of Law : A person, including a stranger, could maintain a petition under Rule 97 of Order XXI and object and get adjudication when he sought to be dispossessed by the decree holder. The express....
The principle of 'interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium' - there should be a limit to the litigation.
Rule 35 of Order 21 deals with modes of executing a decree for possession of immovable properties.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the decree of permanent injunction is binding on all parties, and relief can be sought under Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure ....
The Execution Court's rejection of a petition under Section 47 of the CPC was justified due to the petitioners' inconsistent claims over property ownership and tenancy, indicating a deliberate attemp....
The court emphasized the limited grounds on which a decree is unexecutable and highlighted that the right of the Decree Holder to obtain relief is determined in accordance with the terms of the decre....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
