G. JAYACHANDRAN
S. P. Velayutham – Appellant
Versus
State by Station House Officer, Inspector of Police, Section V, Economic Offences Wing – Respondent
ORDER :
G. Jayachandran, J.
[PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records relating to the impugned FIR in Crime No.210 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of 1st respondent Inspector of Police, EOW, New Delhi and quash the same as without jurisdiction, vitiated by Legal Malafides and abuse of process of law or in alternative direct the 1st respondent to transfer the Investigation being conducted by the Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi to the Economic Offences Wing, Tambaram Commissionerate or any other investigating agency of the Chennai Police.]
This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records relating to the impugned FIR in Crime No.210 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of 1st respondent/Inspector of Police, EOW, New Delhi and quash the same as without jurisdiction, vitiated by Legal Malafides and abuse of process of law or in alternative, direct the 1st respondent to transfer the Investigation being conducted by the Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi to the Economic Offences Wing, Tambaram Commissionerate or
Oil and Natural Gas Commission vs. Utpal Kumar Basu and others
Navinchandra N. Majithia vs. State of Maharashtra and others
State of H.P. vs. Pirithi Chand and another
Satvinder Kaur vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and another
Section 177 of the CrPC unambiguously states that every offence shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by a Court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed.
The territorial jurisdiction of a court to try a criminal case is determined by the place where the offense was committed. However, Section 178 of the Criminal Procedure Code allows for trial in a co....
The court emphasized the importance of determining the jurisdiction for inquiry and trial of an offence based on the location of the primary consequence of the alleged acts, as per the provisions of ....
Point of law: power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the purpose of quashing the F.I.R. is concerned, the only criteria is the situs of the authority who has registered the cas....
Criminal jurisdiction is restricted to the area where the offence occurred, and parties cannot confer jurisdiction through a contract; thus, allegations of fraud in a lease agreement without evidence....
Point of Law : Offence of Cheating - Inherit Powers of High Court - Extraordinary and inherent power of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., do not tilt in favour of the petitioners to pass an or....
The court affirmed that ongoing investigations by CID Crime are valid despite no FIR being registered, emphasizing that courts should not interfere unless exceptional circumstances arise.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for the Magistrate to apply judicial mind before directing investigation under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and the wide powers of the Magistrat....
The court emphasized that it would not hesitate to use its inherent powers to quash the FIR and restrain investigation in cases where the continuance of investigation would result in a miscarriage of....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.