SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1444

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
Sub Registrar, Thirupporur – Appellant
Versus
V. Kannika – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : U.M. Ravichandran.
For the Respondent: M.S. Govindarajan.

JUDGMENT :

S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.

1. The common order dated 30.10.2015 in the writ petitions, is under challenge in the present Writ Appeals.

2. The learned Single Judge, directed the respondent to release the document of the petitioner with the endorsement that it is subject to pendency of the proceedings under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act. The legal position under went changes.

3. As of now during the pendency of the proceedings under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, the Registering Authority is not obligated to release the document of the petitioner.

4. That being so, if the subject document has not been released, then the respondent is at liberty to approach the Competent Authority for disposal of the proceedings initiated under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act.

5. It is made clear that the appellant need not release the subject document unless proceedings under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, stands disposed of.

6. With the above clarifications, the present Writ Appeals stand disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top