JUDGMENT :

(R. Suresh Kumar, J.) :

(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order dated 27.09.2023 in W.P.(MD) No.9324 of 2023 and allow this Writ Appeal.)

This Writ Appeal has been directed against the order made in W.P.(MD)No.9324 of 2023, dated 27.09.2023.

2. Against the very same impugned order, already Writ Appeals have been filed. In one such Writ Appeal in W.A(MD)No. 534 of 2024 in the matter of Directorate of Town and Country Planning and another Vs. Gokila, we passed an order on 02.04.2024, which reads thus:

“2. Though the order passed by the Writ Court has been questioned in this Writ Appeal, when the case is taken up for admission, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellants would contend that only against awarding of cost by the learned Single Judge in the order impugned, this Writ Appeal has been filed. Therefore, to that extent, if the cost imposed by the learned Single Judge is interfered with, the appellants would be satisfied without canvassing the points on merits with regard to the order passed by the Writ Court.

3. He would further submit that in the similar line already the Writ Appeal in W.A.(