SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1735

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
Principal Secretary to Government – Appellant
Versus
K. S. Abubucker – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellant :Mr.R.Neelakandan Additional Advocate General
For the Respondent: Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan, Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar

JUDGMENT :

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order passed in W.P.No.27793 of 2013 dated 03.01.2014.

Mr.R.Neelakandan, learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that the grievances of the first respondent have already been redressed and allowed to retire from service subject to outcome of the disciplinary proceedings. As far as the 2nd respondent is concerned, he is continuing in service.

2. Therefore, both the learned respective Counsels appearing on behalf of the appellant and the respondents would submit no further consideration is required in the present writ appeal. Consequently, the Writ Appeal stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top