SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1538

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, N.SENTHILKUMAR, JJ.
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
P.Subramani - Respondent
W.A.Nos.366 & 376 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1, 2 & 1 of 2014
Decided on : 05-07-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr.M.S.Prem Kumar Government Advocate [For Forest]
For the Respondent: Mr.K.M.Ramesh Senior Counsel For Mr.K.Vasudevan

IMPORTANT POINT
Employees regularized after 01.04.2003 are governed by the new contributory pension scheme, not the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

Headnote:

Pension - Regularization - Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 - The court interpreted the applicability of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, emphasizing that employees regularized after 01.04.2003 are governed by the new contributory pension scheme, thus denying the benefit of counting temporary service under the old rules.

Fact of the Case:

The respondents were initially appointed as temporary Plot Watchers and later regularized in 2012. They sought to count half of their temporary service for pension benefits under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the respondents, having been regularized after the cut-off date of 01.04.2003, were not eligible for benefits under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, and were instead covered by the new contributory pension scheme.

Issues: Whether the respondents could count their temporary service for pension benefits under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 despite being regularized after the cut-off date of 01.04.2003.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 do not apply to employees regularized after 01.04.2003, and thus, they are entitled only to benefits under the new contributory pension scheme.

Result: The writ order was set aside, and the Writ Appeals were allowed.

JUDGMENT :

[Judgment was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order passed in W.P.No.1122 of 2013 dated 11.11.2013 and allow the present writ appeal.

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order passed in W.P.No.25279 of 2013 dated 11.11.2013 and allow the present writ appeal.

The Intra-Court Appeals on hand have been instituted challenging the common order dated 11.11.2013 passed in the writ petitions.

2. The undisputed facts between the parties are that the respondents were initially appointed as temporary Plot Watchers and considering their length of service as temporary employees, the Government formulated a scheme for regularisation of these temporary employees and consequently their services are regularised with effect from 09.07.2012 and 12.07.2012 respectively in sanctioned post of Plot Watcher in the time scale of pay.

3. It is not in dispute that the initial appointment of the respondents were made not in a sanctioned post, but on temporary basis. Therefore, the initial appointment of the respondents were not under pensionable establishment under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

4. The Government framed a scheme for the benefit of these temporary employees as a concession. Accordingly, their services are subsequently regularised in sanctioned posts in the time scale of pay in the year 2012. Therefore, the temporary Plot Watchers were brought under the pensionable establishment only in the year 2012. By that time, the new pension scheme came into force and the cut-off date for old pension scheme is 01.04.2003. All the employees appointed/regularised after the cut-off date of 01.04.2003 are eligible to receive benefits under the contributory pension scheme and not under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 (old pension scheme).

5. The relief sought for by the respondents are to count half of the services under Rule 11 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules.

6. Rule 11(2) in clear terms stipulates that “half of the service paid from contingencies shall be allowed to count towards qualifying service for pension along with the regular services subject to conditions”. However, the said Rule 11 would be applicable only if these temporary employees were appointed/regularised prior to the implementation of the new pension scheme i.e., on 01.04.2003. The employees appointed/regularised after 01.04.2003 are not falling under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

7. That being the legal position, application of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 to the employees regularised after the cut-off date of 01.04.2003 would not arise at all. Once these employees are eligible under the new pension scheme i.e., contributory pension scheme, the benefits as admissible under the new pension scheme alone is to be paid and they cannot seek benefit under the old pension scheme for counting of 50% of their temporary services. It cannot be applied in either way. Once the eligibility of the employee comes under the new pension scheme, benefits are to be settle under the new pension scheme. The respondents are entitled to get benefits under the new pension scheme, in view of the fact that the services are regularised in the year 2012.

8. Mr.K.M.Ramesh, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent in W.A.No.366 of 2014 would rely on the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 06.07.2021 in W.A.No.1590 of 2017.

9. We have considered the said order, wherein, there is no factual discussion about the service particulars of those employees. The principles laid down in the case of Government of Tamil Nadu and Others vs. R.Kaliyamoorthy, (2019) 6 CTC 705 has been referred. But the implications were not considered by the Division Bench. Thus, the said order need not be followed as a precedent for the purpose of granting relief to all other cases falling under the contributory pension scheme i.e., new pension scheme.

10.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top