SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1825

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
Executive Officer – Appellant
Versus
N. Lilli Vasanthakumari – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellant : Mr.P.Srinivas
For the Respondents:Mr.M.Vijayakumar, Mr.R.Neelakandan, Additional Advocate General

JUDGMENT :

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 12.04.2019 made in W.P.No.9129 of 2013.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-Sembakkam Town Panchayat Mr.P.Srinivas would submit that the issues raised in the Writ Appeal are no more res integra. The Full Bench of this Court considered the issues in Rev.Aplc.(MD) No.87 of 2014 in WA(MD).No.729 of 2013 etc., and delivered the judgment on 30.05.2017. The said Full Bench judgment has taken by way of Appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in SLP (C) No.21935 of 2017 and subjudiced. That being the factum, the respondent-Employees is entitled for the benefit if any granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the pending SLP. In other words, the order to be passed by the Apex Court is to be extended to the respondents in the matter of granting service benefits.

2. With the above observations, the Writ Appeal stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected CMP is also closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top