SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2109

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
N.Seshasayee, P.Vadamalai, JJ.
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., - Petitioner
Versus
G.S.Abiramavalli and ors. – Respondents
C.M.A(MD)Nos. 932, 933, 321, 322 and 323 of 2017 And .M.P(MD)Nos. 3672, 3671, 3673, 9807 and 9808 of 2017
Decided On : 18-12-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.M.E.Ilango
For the Respondent: Mr.B.Ramanathan, V.Muthukamatchi

The court reaffirmed that negligence in motor vehicle accidents is determined by preponderance of probabilities, and established that split multipliers for compensation calculations are erroneous.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 - Civil Miscellaneous Appeals against the common order dated 29.04.2016 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Madurai - The Tribunal awarded compensation for a road accident resulting in multiple fatalities and injuries - The court upheld the Tribunal's finding of negligence on the bus driver, rejecting the Insurance Company's claims of the car driver's fault - The court emphasized that acquittal in a criminal case does not absolve liability in civil claims. (Paras 10, 18, 24, 45)

(B) Compensation - The court modified the compensation awarded by the Tribunal, enhancing amounts based on established legal principles regarding future prospects and personal expenses - The court reiterated the necessity of applying the correct multiplier based on the deceased's age and employment status. (Paras 26, 31, 36, 45)

Facts of the case:
The appeals arose from a road accident on 24.08.2008 involving a bus and a TATA Indica car, resulting in the deaths of two individuals and injuries to others. The claimants sought compensation from the bus's insurer, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited, which contested liability.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the Tribunal's findings of negligence against the bus driver and modified the compensation awarded to the claimants, ensuring it aligned with legal precedents regarding income and future prospects.

Issues: The main issues included the determination of negligence in the accident and the appropriate calculation of compensation based on the deceased's income and age.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the evidence supported the Tribunal's conclusion of negligence on the bus driver's part, and the acquittal in the criminal case did not negate civil liability. The court also clarified the principles for calculating compensation, emphasizing the need for a correct multiplier based on age and employment status.

Result: Appeals partly allowed and compensation modified.

JUDGMENT :

P.VADAMALAI, J.

PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.200 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Judge, Madurai and allow this appeal.

PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.197 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Judge, Madurai and allow this appeal.

PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.201 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Judge, Madurai and allow this appeal.

PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.389 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Judge, Madurai and allow this appeal.

PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.195 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Judge, Madurai and allow this appeal.

These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals in C.M.A(MD)Nos.932, 933, 321, 322 and 323 of 2017 are preferred against the common order, dated 29.04.2016 passed in M.C.O.P.Nos.195 of 2010, 200 of 2010, 197 of 2010, 201 of 2010 and 389 of 2010, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Court, Madurai.

2. The 2nd respondent/Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited in M.C.O.P.Nos.195 of 2010, 200 of 2010, 197 of 2010, 201 of 2010 and 389 of 2010, which is the Insurance Company of the bus bearing registration No.TN 59 U 7725, which faced liability to pay compensation for five separate claims made by the claimants of a road accident that took place on 24.08.2008 at around 4.00 p.m. between the bus insured with the 2nd respondent and TATA Indica car bearing registration No.TN 59 AE 6318, is the appellant herein.

3. The respective respondent/petitioner/claimants (dependants of deceased and injured) have filed the respective claim petitions in M.C.O.P.Nos.195 of 2010, 200 of 2010, 197 of 2010, 201 of 2010 and 389 of 2010 against four respondents (owners of lorry and Maruti car and their Insurance Companies).

4. For the sake of convenience, the rank of parties as arrayed in claim petitions in M.C.O.P.Nos.195 of 2010, 200 of 2010, 197 of 2010, 201 of 2010 and 389 of 2010 are adopted hereunder.

5. The brief facts of the case :

    On the fateful day 24.08.2008, the deceased Murugapandian @ Murugapandi was driving the TATA Indica car bearing registration number TN 59 AE 6318 from Theni to Madurai along with his friends deceased Balakrishnan and the injured Prabaharan, Sathyan and Thiruvenkatam, by following traffic rules at a moderate speed. At 4.00 p.m., when the car was coming west to east at curve road in front of Vadikaruppa Kovil, Vadikovilpatti village, the 1st respondent’s bus bearing registration number TN 59 U 7725 driven by its driver from the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner without observing traffic rules, dashed against the TATA Indica car and the car was dragged from the left side to right side to a distance of 150 feet. Due to impact, the deceased/driver Murugapandi sustained multiple grievous injuries and died on the spot. The deceased Balakrishnan sustained multiple grievous injuries and died on the way to hospital. The injured Prabaharan, Sathyan and Thiruvenkatam sustained grievous injuries all over the body. F.I.R. was registered in Crime No.142 of 2008, U/s.279, 337, 338 and 304(A) of IPC, against the bus driver by the

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top