BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
N.Seshasayee, P.Vadamalai, JJ.
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., - Petitioner
Versus
G.S.Abiramavalli and ors. – Respondents
C.M.A(MD)Nos. 932, 933, 321, 322 and 323 of 2017 And .M.P(MD)Nos. 3672, 3671, 3673, 9807 and 9808 of 2017
Decided On : 18-12-2024
JUDGMENT :
P.VADAMALAI, J.
PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.200 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Judge, Madurai and allow this appeal.
PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.197 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Judge, Madurai and allow this appeal.
PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.201 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Judge, Madurai and allow this appeal.
PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.389 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Judge, Madurai and allow this appeal.
PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.195 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Judge, Madurai and allow this appeal.
These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals in C.M.A(MD)Nos.932, 933, 321, 322 and 323 of 2017 are preferred against the common order, dated 29.04.2016 passed in M.C.O.P.Nos.195 of 2010, 200 of 2010, 197 of 2010, 201 of 2010 and 389 of 2010, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/V Additional District Court, Madurai.
2. The 2nd respondent/Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited in M.C.O.P.Nos.195 of 2010, 200 of 2010, 197 of 2010, 201 of 2010 and 389 of 2010, which is the Insurance Company of the bus bearing registration No.TN 59 U 7725, which faced liability to pay compensation for five separate claims made by the claimants of a road accident that took place on 24.08.2008 at around 4.00 p.m. between the bus insured with the 2nd respondent and TATA Indica car bearing registration No.TN 59 AE 6318, is the appellant herein.
3. The respective respondent/petitioner/claimants (dependants of deceased and injured) have filed the respective claim petitions in M.C.O.P.Nos.195 of 2010, 200 of 2010, 197 of 2010, 201 of 2010 and 389 of 2010 against four respondents (owners of lorry and Maruti car and their Insurance Companies).
4. For the sake of convenience, the rank of parties as arrayed in claim petitions in M.C.O.P.Nos.195 of 2010, 200 of 2010, 197 of 2010, 201 of 2010 and 389 of 2010 are adopted hereunder.
5. The brief facts of the case :
On the fateful day 24.08.2008, the deceased Murugapandian @ Murugapandi was driving the TATA Indica car bearing registration number TN 59 AE 6318 from Theni to Madurai along with his friends deceased Balakrishnan and the injured Prabaharan, Sathyan and Thiruvenkatam, by following traffic rules at a moderate speed. At 4.00 p.m., when the car was coming west to east at curve road in front of Vadikaruppa Kovil, Vadikovilpatti village, the 1st respondent’s bus bearing registration number TN 59 U 7725 driven by its driver from the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner without observing traffic rules, dashed against the TATA Indica car and the car was dragged from the left side to right side to a distance of 150 feet. Due to impact, the deceased/driver Murugapandi sustained multiple grievous injuries and died on the spot. The deceased Balakrishnan sustained multiple grievous injuries and died on the way to hospital. The injured Prabaharan, Sathyan and Thiruvenkatam sustained grievous injuries all over the body. F.I.R. was registered in Crime No.142 of 2008, U/s.279, 337, 338 and 304(A) of IPC, against the bus driver by the
AI
The court reaffirmed that negligence in motor vehicle accidents is determined by preponderance of probabilities, and established that split multipliers for compensation calculations are erroneous.
The judgment establishes that in motor accident claims, the correct application of multipliers based on the deceased's age and future income prospects is crucial for determining fair compensation, al....
The tribunal’s reliance on split multiplier method for determining compensation was found erroneous; proper calculation shows enhanced compensation of Rs.42,02,444/- owed to claimants.
Point of law: deceased was employed as Assistant Administrative Officer in Agricultural Department and was earning an income of Rs.17,529/- per month, which is evidenced by Exs.P.6 and P.7 Salary Cer....
In motor accident injury claims, medically assessed permanent disability by competent doctor must be accepted absent rebuttal; Tribunal cannot arbitrarily reduce without reasoning. Notional income an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the re-assessment of notional income and enhancement of compensation under various heads to ensure just and reasonable compensation for the claiman....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.