V.Manjuladevi vs A.Pandi - 2026 Supreme(Mad) 1167

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1167

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VADAMALAI, J
V.Manjuladevi – Appellant
Versus
A.Pandi – Respondent

Advocates:
For Appellant : Mr.B.A.Muruganantham, Ms.S.Bharathi, Ms.P.Malini, Mr.C.Jawhar Ravindran
For R1 : Ms.S.Bharathi
For R2 : Ms.P.Malini
For R3 : No Appearance
For R4 : Mr.C.Jawhar Ravindran

Table of Content
1. details of accident and claim petitions filed (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5)
2. tribunal proceedings and initial award (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. confirmed lorry driver's negligence (Para 11 , 12)
4. enhanced compensation for 37% disability, rs.3000% (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. enhanced compensation for 35% disability, rs.3000% (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
6. final enhanced awards and deposit directions (Para 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT :

P. VADAMALAI, J.

These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are preferred against the Common Award, dated 19.10.2016 passed in M.C.O.P.Nos.1089 and 1064 of 2005 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai.

2.The petitioner/claimant in respective petitions in M.C.O.P.Nos.1064 of 2005 and 1089 of 2005 are the appellants herein.

3.The petitioners/claimants filed the claim petitions in M.C.O.P.Nos.1064 of 2005 and 1089 of 2005 praying for compensation for the injuries sustained by them in a road traffic accident.

4.For the sake of convenience, the parties as arrayed in M.C.O.P.Nos.1064 of 2005 and 1089 of 2005 is adopted hereunder.

5.The brief facts of the case:

On 09.03.2005 at 07.00 a.m., the claimants Manjuladevi and Sadhyabama @ Sathyapriya w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1167

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASP.VADAMALAI, JV.Manjuladevi – AppellantVersusA.Pandi – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VADAMALAI, J
V.Manjuladevi – Appellant
Versus
A.Pandi – Respondent