SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2033

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.S.Ramesh, A.D.Maria Clete, JJ.
The Joint Commissioner (ST) – Appellant
Versus
M.Anthoniammal - Respondent
W.A.(MD).Nos.2317 to 2333 of 2024 and C.M.P.(MD).Nos.16082 to 16085, 16087, 16090 to 16092, 16094 to 16096, 16099, 16101 to 16103, 16106 and 16108 of 2024
Decided On : 11-11-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandhran, Additional Government Pleader
For the Respondent: Mr.J.Pooventherarajan

G.O(Ms)No.152 extends service protection to employees absorbed from the Kadhi Board, and recovery of excess payments from Group C and D employees is impermissible under law.

Headnote:(A) Government Orders - G.O(Ms)No.154 and G.O(Ms)No.152 - Service protection and pay protection for employees of the Tamil Nadu Kadhi Board - G.O(Ms)No.152 amended G.O(Ms)No.154 to include service protection and pensionary benefits for absorbed employees - The learned Single Judge's decision to cancel selection grade/special grade of pay was found to be illegal. (Paras 2-10)

(B) Recovery of excess payments - The court reaffirmed that recovery from Group C and D employees is impermissible in law, referencing the Supreme Court's ruling in State of Punjab and Others v. Rafiq Masih (White Washer's case). (Paras 10-11)

Facts of the case:
The appellant challenged the cancellation of selection grade/special grade of pay granted to employees absorbed from the Tamil Nadu Kadhi Board, which was deemed illegal by the learned Single Judge.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the learned Single Judge's ruling, confirming that service protection was extended to the employees under G.O(Ms)No.152.

Issues: The main issue was whether the amendment to G.O(Ms)No.154 allowed for service protection beyond pensionary calculations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that G.O(Ms)No.152 clearly extended service protection to employees, and recovery of excess payments from employees was impermissible.

Result: Writ Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

M.S.RAMESH, J.

PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order dated 19.09.2023 passed in W.P.(MD).No.6880 of 2023 on the file of this Court and allow this Writ Appeal.

Challenging the common order dated 19.09.2023 in W.P.(MD).Nos.6880 to 6896 of 2023, the appellant is before this Court with these appeals.

2. When the Tamil Nadu Kadhi Board was declared to be financially in-viable to run the unit, employees of the board were absorbed to other Government departments through G.O(Ms)No.154 Handloom, Handicraft, Textiles and Kadhi Department dated 21.11.2009. As per the said G.O., the employees, who have been absorbed to other departments, will be treated as new appointees with pay protection. However, the service protection was not extended to them.

3. The aforesaid G.O(Ms)No.154 came to be subsequently amended through G.O(Ms)No.152 Handloom, Handicraft, Textiles and Kadhi Department dated 12.07.2012, wherein, the service protection was also extended to these employees who were transferred from the Board apart from their pay protection. In addition, G.O(Ms)No.152 also gave credit to the service rendered by them in the Board, for the purpose of calculating the pensionary service period.

4. Thereafter, all the erstwhile employees of the Board were extended with selection grade of pay on completion of 10 years and special grade of pay on completion of 20 years of service, which service period included their earlier service rendered in the Board.

5. Through a letter dated 19.12.2017, the Secretary to Government, Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles and Kadhi Department, had permitted all the Heads of the Departments to treat the selection grade/special grade of pay granted to these employees as illegal and ordered for recovery of the excess payment made to them. The letter of the Secretary dated 19.12.2017 was assailed before the learned Single Judge The letter of the Secretary dated 19.12.2017 was assailed before this Court in W.P.(MD).No.2560 of 2018 and the same was allowed and the authorities were directed to pass orders afresh after hearing the writ petitioners. Pursuant to the same, the appellant herein passed orders dated 29.11.2022, cancelling the special grade of pay granted to the respondents and ordered for recovery of payment, which orders were put to challenge before the learned Single Judge.

6. The learned Single Judge placed reliance on an earlier decision of the writ Court in W.P(MD).No.4976 of 2020 relating to similar excessive staff of the Board, who were absorbed in the other Government Departments and whose award of selection grade/special grade of pay was cancelled and held that the cancellation of selection grade/special grade is illegal. The orders passed in those writ petitions are assailed in these intra-Court appeals.

7. The only ground raised by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellant is that G.O(Ms)No.152 enables for inclusion of the service period of those employees with Kadhi Board, only for the limited purpose of calculating the pensionary services and not otherwise and therefore, the award of selection/special grade of pay was rightly declared to be illegal and the consequential recovery was ordered by the appellant and thereby sought for setting aside the orders of the writ Court.

8. We do not agree with such a submission, since G.O(Ms)No.152, which is an amendment to the earlier G.O(Ms)No.154, extends service protection simpliciter, as well as for inclusion of service period of any employee, G.O(Ms)No.152 in this regard is self explanatory, which reads as follows:

9. When the employees of Kadhi Board were ordered to be absorbed in other Government departments, G.O(Ms)No.154 came to be passed with a specific clause that these employees will have the benefit of pay protection, but cannot be extended with service protection. However, G.O(Ms)No.152 brought forth an amendment to G.O(Ms)No.154, by incorporating service protection also, a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top