Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
AMITENDRA KISHORE PRASAD
Amrit Lal Sahu, S/o. Kanhaiyalal Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Education – Respondent
Order :
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.
1. Since all the writ petitions involve a common question of law and are founded on similar facts and circumstances, they have been clubbed together, heard analogously, and are being disposed of by this common order. This approach has been adopted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and to ensure uniformity and consistency in the adjudication of the issues involved.
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the respondents in applying the subsequent notifications dated 28.07.2020 and 29.07.2020 retrospectively to the vacancies advertised on 09.03.2019 by contending that the said notifications are prospective in nature and could not have been made applicable to the recruitment process initiated under the advertisement dated 09.03.2019. Accordingly, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondent authorities to modify their appointment orders in accordance with the Rules and instructions prevailing on the date of the advertisement and on the date when the vacancies actually arose, i.e., 09.03.2019. It is further contended that as per the Rules existing at the time of advertisement, the probation period for the post in question was two yea
The court ruled that recruitment rules existing at the time of advertisement govern terms of appointment, and any retrospective application of subsequent rules is unconstitutional and violates the pr....
The court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision granting pay protection, emphasizing adherence to established legal precedents and rejecting arbitrary distinctions in pay protection e....
Service Law - Scale of pay - In view of amendment of ROP,1999 by Fifth Amendment insofar as our case is concerned, this subsequent amendment under Eighteenth Amendment Rules did not have any further ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prescribed scale of pay in the recruitment notification for direct recruitment to government schools prevails over claims for pay protecti....
The judgment establishes the principle of protecting past service and pay for government employees joining new posts without a break in service, as per Rule 41 of BCSR and relevant government resolut....
Employees are entitled to pay protection on transfer even if the probation period is not completed, and pay reductions without notice violate natural justice.
Retrospective withdrawal of accrued financial benefits under the 5th CPC without proper legislative authority violates principles of natural justice and the rule of law, affecting vested rights and e....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
