SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2046

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, R. POORNIMA, JJ.
Syed @ Syed Abdhahir – Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Crl.A.(MD)No.301 of 2020
Decided on : 30-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr.A.Ravichandra Ramavanni
For the Respondent: Mr.S.Ravi, Additional Public Prosecutor

The prosecution must prove specific overt acts of each accused in a murder case; mere presence is insufficient for conviction.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 148, 149, 506(ii) - Conviction and sentence of life imprisonment for murder set aside due to lack of direct evidence and failure to establish specific overt acts against the accused - The prosecution's reliance on a sole eyewitness was insufficient to uphold the conviction. (Paras 61, 63)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted for the murder of Mohammed Yusuf, stemming from a civil dispute. The incident occurred on 04.09.2011, where the deceased was attacked by the accused after a vehicular collision. Eyewitness accounts were inconsistent, and the prosecution failed to produce corroborative evidence.

Findings of Court:
The trial court's conviction was based on insufficient evidence, particularly the lack of direct testimony regarding the specific actions of each accused during the incident.

Issues: The main issues included the credibility of the sole eyewitness, the adequacy of the evidence presented, and the establishment of the accused's specific roles in the crime.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that mere presence at the scene of a crime is not sufficient for conviction; specific overt acts must be established. The prosecution's failure to provide corroborative evidence led to reasonable doubt regarding the accused's guilt.

Result: Criminal Appeal allowed; conviction set aside and accused acquitted.

JUDGMENT :

(Judgment of this Court delivered by R.POORNIMA, J.)

Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the conviction and sentence dated 30.07.2020 passed in S.C.No.49 of 2012 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram.

This Criminal Appeal is filed against the conviction and sentence passed against the accused Nos. 2 and 3/appellants in the judgment dated 30.07.2020 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, in S.C.No.49 of 2012 by convicting and sentencing the appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 302 to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a sum of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of fine , further undergo punishment for 2 years.

2. The appellants herein are the accused 2 and 3 in the trial Court in S.C.No.49 of 2012. They have preferred this Criminal Appeal, against the judgment of conviction, under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C, 1973.

3. The appellants/accused Nos. 2 and 3 were convicted under Section 302 I.P.C and sentenced to undergo for life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment, to undergo 2 years simple imprisonment. The appellants paid the fine amount. Aggrieved by the above conviction order and sentence, this Criminal Appeal has been filed by the appellants A2 and A3.

4. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.

5. As per the case of the prosecution, all the accused are relatives. They had previous enmity, with the deceased due to a civil dispute. On 04.09.2011, the deceased – Mohammed Yusuf and his friend Hammed Mahaboob, had gone to Ramanathapuram to deposit money to contest the elections. After knowing the same, the Accused Nos. 1 to 6 unlawfully assembled with deadly weapons and were waiting for the deceased near S.P.Pattinam bus stand near Siddika Beevi House. On the same day, at about 09.30 pm, the deceased – Mohammed Yusuf and his friend Hammed Mahaboob came in a bus and got down in S.P.Patttinam Bus stand, took their two wheeler. They started moving towards their house. A2 was driving the two wheeler belonging to the third accused. Both A3 and A6 were also sitting in the vehicle and came in the opposite direction to the bike of deceased and dashed against the vehicle, in which, the deceased Mohammed Yusuf and his friend Hammed Mahaboob were traveling.

6. P.W.1 who was waiting near the road side for his son, witnessed the occurrence. Mohammed Yusuf fell down from the vehicle. He was surrounded by A1 to A6 and A6 shouted to A1 that he should not leave Mohammed Yusuf alive. A1 took a knife which was hidden in his hip and stabbed the victim on his chest. The said Mohammed Yusuf, in order to save his live, rushed into house of the witness - Siddhik Beevi. A1 to A3 chased him and went inside the said house and locked the door from inside and indiscriminately inflicted injuries all over the body viz below left chest, near the left nipple, above the ribs, near the cheek, near the right ear etc.

7. P.W.1 raised a hue and cry and tried to enter into the house but was prevented by A6 to A8 from entering into the house. Thereafter, all the accused fled away from the place of occurrence. P.W.1 rushed to the spot and saw his son in a pool of blood. He lodged the complaint. The F.I.R was registered in Cr.No.70/2011 under section 147, 148, 302 IPC and the same was sent to the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai.

8. The Inspector of Police, Ramanadapuram, P.W.23 took the case for investigation, visited the place of occurred on 05.9.2021 at 12.30 p.m. It was noticed that the relatives had staged dharna with the dead body. He seized the dead body and sent it to the Thiruvadanai Government Hospital for Postmortem. He prepared observation mahazar Ex.P.2 in the presence of witnesses Sagubar Sadiq, Syed Abdhahir and also drew rough sketch under Ex.P19. He seized the two wheeler TN-09-AR-0290 used by the accused He seiz

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top