Back
P. DHANABAL
Chief Executive Officer and Secretary – Appellant
Versus
D. Selvam – Respondent
ORDER :
This Civil Revision Petition is filed as against the order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2021 in O.S.No.3962 of 2020 on the file of XIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai dated 14.06.2022 wherein the petitioner herein has filed an Interlocutory Application before the trial Court to reject the plaint and the same was dismissed.
2. The brief averments of the petition filed before the trial Court are as follows:
The petitioner is the defendant in the suit and the respondent as plaintiff filed a suit for the relief of declaration to declare the notice dated 29.10.2020 issued to him by the petitioner/defendant is illegal and the same is not binding on the respondent/plaintiff and also for a consequential relief permanent injunction restraining the petitioner/defendant, their men, their servants and others acting on their behalf from removing and prohibiting the respondent/plaintiff's entry in the Madras Race Club including the benefit as a Stand Member SMS 2303, except by due process of law under the bye laws of the petitioner/defendant's Club.
2.1 The petitioner/defendant Club is a company defined under Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Club is governed by a committee of ma
The Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over matters under the Companies Act, but the distinction between Stand Members and Club Members requires a full trial to determine rights and jurisdiction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the interpretation of the Articles of Association, which falls under the jurisdiction of the civil court, is not within the jurisdiction of th....
When a specialized tribunal is empowered by statute to adjudicate disputes involving company oppression and mismanagement, including the authority to grant interim injunctions, the jurisdiction of ci....
Power can only be given by the board of directors of the company in exercise of its statutory power by passing the resolution under the provisions of Section 291 of the Companies Act in favour of a d....
The court affirmed that an internal club decision regarding suspension cannot be challenged without prior legal compliance, limiting judicial review of such organizational actions.
Only members as defined under the Companies Act have standing to file a petition, hence the Court did not recognize the Petitioners' claims due to invalid membership post-merger.
Condition precedent for invocation of Section 241(2) of the Act, which requires the Central Government to come to an opinion that the affairs of the company “are being conducted in a manner prejudici....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
