SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2157

R. SUBRAMANIAN, R. SAKTHIVEL
Syed Akbar (Died) – Appellant
Versus
V. Thilagar Madasamy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.J.Amritha Sarayoo
For the Respondents: Mr.M.L.Ganesh

JUDGEMENT :

R.Subramanian, J.

The defendant in OS No.7875 of 2010 on the file of the XVII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, is on Appeal, challenging the decree for specific performance granted in the said suit. The parties will be referred to as per their rank in the suit for conviniance.

2. According to the plaintiff, the defendant agreed to sell the suit property viz. the super structure and the lease hold rights over the land belonging to a waqf under the suit agreement dated 12.10.2007 for a total consideration of Rs.11,75,00,000/-. A sum of Rs.1,00,000/- was paid as contract. The plaintiff caused a notice to be issued on 19.03.2008 demanding performance expressing his readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract.

3. The defendant sent a reply on 04.04.2008 claiming that the Agreement is not valid and the same was extracted when the defendant was not in a proper and fixed state of mind and health. It is also claimed that he was in a severe state of mental shock due to an auction notice received from the Government approved auctioneers at the instance of his creditors which fixed the date of auction on 12.10.2007.

4. The defendant further averred that he was not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top