IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
K. Sivakumar – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P. No. 19864 of 2021, W.M.P. Nos. 21122, 21124, 21209 of 2021
Decided On : 20-09-2024
ORDER :
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order of the first respondent dated 03.09.2021 in G.O. (Ms.) No. 108, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (PR-1) Department, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazettee Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 2, dated 03.09.2021, and quash the same only insofar as it relates to the reservation for the post of President of the Nayakkaneri village panchayat, Madhanur panchayat union, Tirupathur district, for Scheduled Castes women.
1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent dated 03.09.2021, in G.O. (Ms.) No. 108 Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (PR-1) Department, which relates to the reservation for the post of President of the Nayakkaneri Village Panchayat, Madhanur Panchayat Union, Thirpathur District, for Scheduled Castes women.
Facts of the case:
2. The first petitioner is a former panchayat President. He was elected and functioned as President of Nayakkaneri village panchayat in the year 2011 to 2016. The second petitioner belongs to Scheduled Tribes community and his father was elected as President of Nayakkaneri village panchayat from 1986 to 1991. The second petitioner was also elected as Ward Member in the year 2006, of ward No. 12 of Madhanur panchayat union, which reserved for Scheduled Tribes.
3. The Nayakkaneri village is situated in a mountain, 864 meters above the sea level. It consists nine wards and total population is about 7000 in which, voters are 3440. Majority of population viz. 66% belong to Scheduled Tribes and the remaining 34% of the population to other communities. In the said panchayat, no one belongs to Scheduled Castes community in the entire village. Therefore, the government of Tamil Nadu has reserved the post of Ward Members viz. Ward Nos. 1 to 8 for Scheduled Tribes candidate from the year 1986 and the post of President was also reserved for Scheduled Tribes candidate from 1986 to 2011. In the year 2011, it has changed from the reservation for Scheduled Tribes to general by rotation. Only one ward viz. Ward No. 9 alone was allotted for general and other wards were reserved only for Scheduled Tribes. It was continued for more than 25 years. Though the said panchayat was allotted for general woman in the year 2016, for the post of village panchayat President, no election was conducted from 2016 to 2021.
4. While being so, the first respondent issued the impugned order thereby reserved the post of President of Nayakkaneri village panchayat for Scheduled Castes women under Section 57 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994 r/w. Rule 6 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat (Reservation of Seats and Rotation of Reserved Seats) Rules 1995 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”). Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners filed the present writ petition.
Petitioners' counsel submissions:
5. Mr. K.Selvaraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the fifth respondent submitted nomination for the post of President and she is elected and declared as unopposed candidate for the post of Presidentm moreover, her name is not even found in the Ward No. 9 of the Nayakkaneri village. Therefore, she is not qualified to contest in the election for the post of President as per Section 33 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994. In fact, her application for inclusion of her name in ward No. 9 of Nayakkaneri village panchayat has been rejected by the Assistant Returning Officer, after conducting field inspection on 21.09.2021.
5.1. Further, the Returning Officer/Block Development Officer of Madhanur panchayat union by its proceedings dated 23.09.2021, submitted a table before this Court consisting of eligible voters in each ward of the Nayakkaneri village panchayat. As per the said table, there is no voters and zero elector/voter of Scheduled Castes candidate in the ninth ward of Nayakkaneri village panchayat. As on 2
K. Venkatachalam Vs. A. Swamickan & Anr. (1999) 4 SCC 526
Bharati Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. (2018) 12 SCC 61
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Vs. Secretary
Election Commission of India Vs. Ashok Kumar & Ors. (2000) 8 SCC 216
Mohinder Singh Gill Vs. Chief Election Commissioner
Union of India Vs. Association for Democratic Reforms and Anr. (2002) 5 SCC 294
Reservation for village panchayat posts must reflect the actual population demographics; improper reservation violates legal provisions.
Court confirmed that judicial intervention in electoral matters is restricted once elections are announced, emphasizing elections must proceed without interruption due to concerns of illegality.
Courts cannot entertain challenges to the formation of wards and reservation of seats for village Panchayats due to the provisions of Article 243-O and the decision in Jadhav Shankar Dyandeo vs. Coll....
Election – Rejected nomination paper - Maintainability of Petition - Petition would not be maintainable against an order rejecting a nomination paper - Section 15 confers very wide powers on trial Ju....
The court emphasized that a writ petition can be entertained to protect the right to a fair election, even in cases where an election petition may exist as an alternate remedy.
The 'power of judicial review' is specially conferred on the Constitutional Courts, i.e. the High Courts and the Supreme Court, under Articles 226 and 32 of the Constitution, respectively.
A person elected in a general category to a Gram Panchayat can contest for the post of Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha in a reserved category, as long as they belong to that reserved category.
A writ petition is not maintainable to challenge an order of rejection of nomination paper by the Returning Officer/competent authority having regard to the provisions in Article 243-O of the Constit....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.