Back
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
P. Sinduja – Appellant
Versus
B. Saravanakumar – Respondent
ORDER :
1. I have heard Ms. P. Sinduja, party-in-person and Mr. S. Kumar for the respondent.
2. This civil revision petition arises against the order of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Vellore District in I.A. No. 1 of 2022 in HMCMA No. 19 of 2022.
3. The civil revision petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband. The petitioner married the respondent on 12.12.2010 at Bargur, Vellore District as per the Hindu Rites and Customs. There are no issues from the wedlock. Due to disputes and differences, the parties separated.
4. The respondent/husband presented HMOP No. 54 of 2013 under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act and sought a decree for dissolution of marriage on the grounds of cruelty.
5. The wife entered appearance and stated that respondent/husband was the one who used to treat her cruelly and used to assault her physically and emotionally. She pleaded that several attempts had been made towards resolution, but it was of no avail. Just prior to the proceedings, a complaint was lodged with All Women Police Station at Ranipet. On 11.01.2012, the husband appeared gave a voluntary statement that he has in his custody. The following articl
A wife can seek return of dowry articles and compensation under the Domestic Violence Act even if a divorce petition is dismissed, and the appeal is maintainable.
A Civil Court can grant relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act even if a divorce petition is dismissed, including the return of articles and compensation.
Dismissal of a divorce petition does not preclude a wife from seeking compensation and return of property under the Domestic Violence Act, empowering courts to grant relief in such disputes.
The court emphasized the necessity for financial disclosure in domestic violence cases to ensure fair maintenance assessments, mandating adherence to established principles from prior apex court ruli....
Domestic violence - First appellate court has passed an order of restitution of conjugal rights which has impermissible having regard to the scope of the appeal under the DV Act
Point of law: Dowry harassment – Return of stridhan – Properties claimed by the respondent wife being her wedding gifts were stridhan and she was the absolute owner of the said property and the husba....
The court considered the financial capabilities, earning capacity of the first petitioner, and the way of life in modifying the maintenance amount and directing the petitioners to hand over 51.25 sov....
(1) Divorce – Temperamental differences between spouses could be resolved over time and should not be used as grounds for divorce.(2) Initiation of D.V. case and M.C case should not be held as cruelt....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an application under Section 26 of the DV Act for maintenance is an independent remedy and should be decided on its merits, taking into accoun....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
