SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2736

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
P. Sinduja – Appellant
Versus
B. Saravanakumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : P. Sinduja [Party-in-Person]

ORDER :

1. I have heard Ms.P.Sinduja, party-in-person and Mr.S.Kumar for the respondent.

2. This civil revision petition arises against the order of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Vellore District in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in HMCMA.No.19 of 2022.

3. The civil revision petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband. The petitioner married the respondent on 12.12.2010 at Bargur, Vellore District as per the Hindu Rites and Customs. There are no issues from the wedlock. Due to disputes and differences, the parties separated.

4. The respondent/husband presented HMOP.No.54 of 2013 under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT and sought a decree for dissolution of marriage on the grounds of cruelty.

5. The wife entered appearance and stated that respondent/husband was the one who used to treat her cruelly and used to assault her physically and emotionally. She pleaded that several attempts had been made towards resolution, but it was of no avail. Just prior to the proceedings, a complaint was lodged with All Women Police Station at Ranipet. On 11.01.2012, the husband appeared gave a voluntary statement that he has in his custody. The following articles bel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top