SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2201

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
V.Shankar – Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s.A.Mary
For the Respondent:Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (crl.side).

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The court quashed the rejection order and directed grant of permission with conditions to maintain public order (!) (!) . - Conditions include time limitations, police protection cost, prohibitions on obscene content, political or communal messaging, and obligations to maintain harmony; violations allow police action (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) . - The decision references prior judgments mandating timely consideration of representations and two-day decision periods by police on such requests (!) (!) . - The order permits but restricts content and ensures public order through specific prohibitions and time constraints (!) (!) (!) - (!) . - The writ petition is allowed with directions, acknowledging cultural programmes as traditional and requiring adherence to conditions (!) (!) . - The petitioner must pay Rs.10,000 towards police protection (!) . - The order notes the possibility of further restrictions or a total ban on flex boards if needed to preserve public order (!) .

What is the court's approach to granting permission for cultural programmes in temples while ensuring public order?

What are the conditions imposed by the court for permission to conduct the Aadal Padal programme?

What is the remedy or direction issued by the court regarding rejection of permission and timely consideration of requests?


ORDER :

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order of rejection dated 10.04.2025 passed by the respondent, wherein permission to conduct the Aadal Padal programme, scheduled from 05.05.2025 to 08.05.2025, at Sri Dhrupati Amman Temple, Thuravi Village, Vikiravandi Taluk, Villupuram District was declined. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to grant permission for conducting the aforementioned programme and to provide adequate police protection for its peaceful and orderly conduct.

2. The petitioner has averred that he is the President of the Village Panchayat of Thuravi Village and a devotee of Sri Draupati Amman Temple. The said festival is celebrated annually in the Tamil month of Chithirai with the participation of all villagers. For the current year, the petitioner proposed to conduct the Adal Padal programme from 05.05.2025 to 08.05.2025. Accordingly, the petitioner submitted a representation to the respondent seeking permission for the same. However, the respondent, without due consideration of the facts and circumstances, rejected the petitioner’s request by order dated 10.04.2025, stating that the conduct of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top