SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2232

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.Arul Murugan, J.
Rangasamy, S/o Ragasamy and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The Commissioner Of Fisheries, Fisheries And Fishermen Welfare and ors. - Respondents
WP No. 17295 of 2025
Decided On : 08-05-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: V. Elangovan
For the Respondent:Mr. A.M. Ayyadurai Government Advocate

Writ petitions can prompt administrative bodies to consider representations and take action within a specified time frame, especially under changing circumstances affecting the petitioners' rights.

Headnote:(A) Government order in G.Ms. No 05 Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries Department dated 30.01.2025 - Writ petition for extension of lease - The petitioners, members of the society, sought an extension due to natural calamities affecting their fishing rights in Barur Big Tank. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Administrative Discretion - The court directed the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders. (Paras 4-5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought an extension of the fishing rights lease from 08.07.2025 for six months, citing inability to continue due to cyclone and natural calamities.

Findings of Court:
Direction given to the 5th respondent to consider the representation and issue orders in accordance with the law within six weeks.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the petitioners' request for lease extension was justified based on natural calamities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for administrative consideration of the petitioner's representation without delving into merits at this stage while ensuring a timely response.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for lease extension. (Para 1)
2. details of the lease agreement and circumstances. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's directive to consider the representation. (Para 4)
4. disposition of the writ petition. (Para 5)

ORDER :

G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.

The Writ Petition on hand has been instituted seeking for a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 22.04.2025 and to grant extension of lease of Barur Big Tank, barur, Pochampalli Taluk which was granted as per the orders of the 5th Respondent dated 09.07.2020 for further period of six months from 08.07.2025 to the 7th respondent society by applying the Government order in G.Ms. No 05 Animal Husbandry, dairying and Fisheries Department dated 30.01.2025.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the 7th respondent Society was granted with lease of fishing rights for the Barur Big Tank, Barur, Pochampalli Taluk on 29.01.2020 for a period of 5 years. The said lease expires on 08.07.2025.

3. It is the submission of the petitioner that they are the members of the 7th respondent Society and in view of the ensuing cyclone and other natural calamities, they are not able to continue their fishing rights. Therefore, the petitioner seeks extension of time.

4. Without going into the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances, the 5th respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top