SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2382

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Nirmal Kumar, J.
State Bank of India, Represented by its Regional Manager - Petitioner
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation and ors. - Respondents
W.P.No.10852 of 2025
Decided On : 09-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Nithyaesh Natraj
For the Respondent: Mr.K.Srinivasan, Special Public Prosecutor

Court directed the CBI to register an FIR based on the bank's complaint due to fraudulent loan approvals and collusion among officials, underscoring the urgency of preventing offenders from evading justice.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Reserve Bank of India Master Circular on Frauds Classification and Reporting - Writ Petition by Regional Manager of a public sector bank seeking direction to Central Bureau of Investigation to register FIR for fraud and misappropriation of public funds involving inflated housing loan and collusion among borrowers and bank officials. (Paras 1-10)

(B) Fraud - Nature and implications - Active collusion between borrower, builder, and bank officials resulting in misappropriation of over Rs.7.34 Crores necessitating immediate investigation and potential issuance of Look Out Circular due to risk of offenders fleeing. (Paras 6, 8)

(C) Regulatory Compliance - Failures in adequate verification of documents and internal procedures by bank officials highlight the need for strict adherence to regulations during loan approval processes to prevent fraudulent activities. (Paras 5, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, as Regional Manager, reported fraudulent activity involving a borrower, who acquired a housing loan purportedly with inflated valuations and manipulated financial credentials, leading to a Notice of Non-Performing Asset by the bank.

Findings of Court:
The request for registration of an FIR is granted based on established fraud and collusion among parties, highlighting deficiencies in internal controls of the bank.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the CBI should be directed to register FIR and investigate the reported fraud after undue delays by authorities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the failure of bank officials in due diligence and the urgent necessity for investigative action given the significant public funds involved.

Result: Writ Petition allowed, directing CBI to register FIR and investigate.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 2)
2. urgency for action against the accused (Para 3 , 7)
3. details on the alleged fraud and misappropriation (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's analysis of procedural delays (Para 6 , 8)
5. direction to register fir and proceed with investigation (Para 9 , 10)

ORDER :

M.Nirmal Kumar, J.

The petitioner, Regional Manager of State Bank of India, Chennai South Zone, West Tambaram, Chennai filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to the respondent/Central Bureau of Investigation to register First Information Report (FIR) on the basis of the complaint, dated 08.03.2023 lodged by the petitioner.

2.Gist of the complaint, dated 08.03.2023 is as follows:

(i) The petitioner, Regional Manager of State Bank of India, Regional Business Office, Tambaram, Chennai is the controller of State Bank of India, Medavakkam Branch. He has been authorized to lodge complaint under the Regulations 76 & 77 of State Bank of India General Regulations, 1955 which is statutory. The Retail Assets Central Processing Centre (In short “RACPC”) is a Loan Processing Cell of the State Bank of India looking after the processing, sanctioning and disbursement of diversified credit facilities such as housing loan, car loan, education loan mortgage loan, personal loan etc. The RACPC also undertakes the end-to- end facilitation viz., preparation of appraisal, pre-sanction and post-sanction/pre-disbursement inspections, documentation and account maintenance for all kinds of credit facilities sanctioned till closure of accounts.

(ii)One Mr.A.Murugan for development and purchase of property i.e., a flat at “R.J.Book Square”, Kundalahalli Village, K.R.Puram, Hobli, BET Bangaluru promoted and sold by M/s.R.J.Rishikaran Projects Private Limited, had approached the State Bank of India, Medavakkam Branch claiming himself to be the Proprietor of M/s.Arun Agency having office at Puzhuthivakkam, Chennai and requested for sanctioning of Housing Term Loan submitting his loan application, dated 30.12.2018. On completion of procedural compliances, the Loan Report was sent to RACPC, Tambaram. The then Branch Manager Mr.T.K.Balaji after completion of Legal Due Diligence, Valuation Process and other documentation process, sanctioned the Housing Loan (HTL Account No.38154161278) for a sum of Rs.550 lakhs in favour of Mr.A.Murugan on 31.12.2018 for development and purchase of property in R.J.Brook Square, Bangaluru.

(iii)As per the loan agreement and documents executed by the said Mr.A.Murugan in favour of the bank on 31.12.2018, the loan amount was agreed to be repaid with interest in Equated Monthly Installments of Rs.4,65,331/- commencing from 30.01.2019. Mr.A.Murugan also availed SBI Suraksh Loan in Account No.38155422163 of Rs.30 lakhs on 31.12.2018. Since the project was under construction/development, Equitable Mortgage was not created in favour of the bank towards the Loan Facility sanctioned. It is to be noted that the said loan was sourced by one Mr.K.Balasubramanian, Housing Loan Counselor.

(iv)After availing the Credit Facilities, the Borrower Mr.A.Murugan not shown interest for repayment and the account became (Non-Performing Asset) NPA on 25.01.2021. On scrutiny, the Bank noticed the breach in the loan agreements and failure on the part of the Borrower to create the Equitable Mortgage of the properties in favour of the Bank and also conducted internal investigation. The internal investigation revealed the fraud committed by Mr.A.Murugan in the housing loan availed by him in HTL Account No.38154161278.

(v)The Income Tax/PAN credentials of the Borrower were not obtained and verified as per guidelines and the verification was done by the then Branch Manager, Medavakkam Branch. Further, the Income Verification of the Borrower was done by M/s.Navashakthi Engineering Private Limited, Chennai. However, the Income Tax Returns for AY 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 were signed by Mr.T.K.Balaji, the then Branch Manager of Medavakkam Branch, not by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top