SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Anish Agarwal, son of late Dhanraj Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, through Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar, the learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr.M.P.No.3140 of 2022, Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr.M.P.No.2681 of 2022, Mr. Sanjay Samdarshi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr.M.P.No.2660 of 2021, Mr. Anil Kumar, the learned A.S.G.I., appearing on behalf of the respondent- Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.) in all the three cases as well as Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sinha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Bank of India.
2. In all these cases, a common question of law has been involved and that is why with consent of all the parties, these petitions have been heard together.
3. In Cr.M.P.No.2660 of 2021, the prayer is made for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 01.09.2021 passed in connection with R.C.01(S)/2019-EOW-Ranchi, pending before the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate-cum-Special Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I., Ranchi; in Cr.M.P.No.2681 of 2022, the prayer is made for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding arising out of CBI/EOW/Ranchi FIR No.RC0932019S0001 dated 10.01.20
Fertico Mktg. & Investment (P) Ltd. v. CBI
H.N. Rishbud v. State of Delhi
State of Karnataka v. Kuppuswamy Gownder
Union of India v. Prakash P. Hinduja
H.N. Rishbud v. State of Delhi
Union of India v. Prakash P. Hinduja
Prakash P. Hinduja v. Union of India
Kanwal Tanuj v. State of Bihar
A.R. Antulay v. Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak
State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal
Ashok Tshering Bhutia v. State of Sikkim
H.N. Rishbud v. State of Delhi
Khandu Sonu Dhobi v. State of Maharashtra
State of M.P. v. Ramesh C. Sharma
State of M.P. v. Virender Kumar Tripathi
State (Inspector of Police) v. Surya Sankaram Karri
State of Orissa v. Mrutunjaya Panda
Shankerbhai Laljibhai Rot v. State of Gujarat
Parkash Singh Badal v. State of Punjab
M.C. Mehta (Taj Corridor Scam) v. Union of India
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
State represented by Inspector of Police, Chennai v. N.S. Gnaneswaran
Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab
State of U.P. v. Bhagwant Kishore Joshi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.