IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.S. SUNDAR, SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, JJ.
The Association of St. Christopher's College of Education, Rep. By its Secretary - Applicant
Versus
The Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Department of School Education and Ors. – Respondents
Review Application Nos.115 & 116 of 2021 in Writ Appeal No. 2882 of 2019 and 2878 of 2019
Decided On : 29-04-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ appeals arise from earlier court decisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background information on the headmistress vacancy and appointments. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. contentions regarding qualifications and selection process. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 4. argument on minority institutions' discretion over appointments. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. submission on adherence to internal management procedures. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. court's acknowledgment of management errors and systemic flaws. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. importance of fair selection procedures in minority institutions. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 8. review judgment allowing retention of appointed headmistress. (Para 37) |
ORDER :
(SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.)
Both these Review Applications arise out the common judgment dated 16.04.2021 passed in Writ Appeal No. 2882 of 2019 and 2878 of 2019 respectively.
2. The aforesaid Writ Appeals were filed as against the common order dated 18.07.2019 passed in Writ Petition No. 9620 and 9612 of 2014 respectively. Out of the two writ petitions mentioned above, the first writ petition in WP No. 9612 of 2014 has been filed by the Association of St. Christophers College of Education, Chennai praying to quash the proceedings dated 12.03.2014 of the second respondent as well as the consequential proceedings dated 14.03.2014 of the fourth respondent and after quashing the orders to issue a consequential direction to direct the official respondents to accord approval for appointment of Mrs. N. Marian Usha Rani as Headmistress in Bentinck Higher Secondary School, Vepery, Chennai with effect from 01.09.2013.
3. The second writ petition in WP No. 9620 of 2014 has been filed by Mrs. N. Marian Usha Rani for the very same prayer to quash the proceedings dated 12.03.2014 of the second respondent as well as the consequential proceedings dated 14.03.2014 of the fourth respondent and after quashing the orders to issue a consequential direction to direct the official respondents to accord approval for her appointment as Headmistress in Bentinck Higher Secondary School, Vepery, Chennai with effect from 01.09.2013.
4. For disposal of these Review Applications, certain facts, which are absolutely germane and necessary are elucidated hereunder.
5. The Bentinck Higher Secondary School for Girls, Vepery, Chennai 600 007 is run by the Association of Saint Christopher. The same management runs the Saint Christopher College of Education at No.63, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Purasawalkam, Chennai - 600 007. On the retirement of Mrs.Chella Nachiyar on 31.08.2013, a post of Headmistress fell vacant. Therefore, advertisement was published in The Hindu newspaper on 09.06.2013, calling for applications for filling up the post of Headmistress. The advertisement reads that “wanted qualified Christian Women candidate for appointment as Headmistress”. In response, applications were received by the Management and ultimately, the management zeroed in on Mrs. N. Marian Usha Rani as Headmistress of the school on 24.07.2013. One of the teachers, who was already working in the same school as a PG Assistant by name Mrs.Ramani Jabathai also applied for the post. According to Mrs. Ramani Jabathai, Mrs. Marian Usha Rani did not possess the prescribed qualifications. Therefore, Mrs. Ramani Jebathai sent a representation dated 17.09.2013 to the official respondents not to accord approval of appointment of Mrs. N. Marian Usha Rani. Notwithstanding the sending of representation, Mrs. Ramani Jebathai also filed WP No. 31245 of 2013 before this Court praying to quash the order dated 24.07.2013 appointing Mrs. Marian Usha Rani as Headmistress of the School. By order dated 20.11.2013, this Court, finding that Mrs. Ramani Jebathai has already filed a statutory appeal on 09.11.2013, disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal. Pursuant to such direction, the Joint Director of School Education (Secondary Education), after hearing the Management of the School and the two teach
Minority institutions have the right to select staff but must ensure fair opportunity for all eligible candidates, aligning with constitutional principles.
The eligibility criteria for appointment as an Officiating/Incharge Principal of an Intermediate College recognized and governed under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
Minority institutions have an absolute right to select their staff without interference from educational authorities, as protected under Article 30 of the Constitution.
The appointments were found to be void ab initio due to the lack of essential qualifications and the flawed selection process.
A candidate has a right to be considered in light of existing Rules which implies Rules in force as on date of consideration.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the right of a religious minority to administer an educational institution of its choice, including the appointment of a Headmaster, is of....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.