IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J.
C/M Sri Shanker Junior High School Thru Manager and others -Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. Thru Secy. of Edu. Basic Lucknow and Ors. - Respondent
Writ-A No. 4215 of 2019
Decided on : 17-02-2022
Advertisement - Appointment of Head Master and Assistant Teachers - Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Junior High School (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act, 1978, U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Services of Teachers) Rules, 1978 - The court found that the advertisement for the appointment of Head Master and Assistant Teachers did not comply with the statutory requirements, and the selection process was defective. The appointments were found to be void ab initio due to the lack of essential qualifications and the flawed selection process.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition sought quashing of the order passed by the Director of Education (Basic), Government of Uttar Pradesh and a Writ of Mandamus/direction to accord approval to the appointment of petitioner nos.2 and 3 and pay their salary w.e.f. 24.12.2011 and 28.12.2011 along with arrears of salary. The petitioners were appointed as Head Master and Assistant Teacher in a Junior High School, but the appointments were found to be void ab initio due to the lack of essential qualifications and the flawed selection process.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the advertisement for the appointment of Head Master and Assistant Teachers did not comply with the statutory requirements, and the selection process was defective. The appointments were found to be void ab initio due to the lack of essential qualifications and the flawed selection process.
Issues: The main issues were the compliance with statutory requirements in the advertisement and the essential qualifications for the appointment of Head Master and Assistant Teachers.
Ratio Decidendi: The appointments were found to be void ab initio due to the lack of essential qualifications and the flawed selection process. The defective advertisement and the lack of compliance with statutory requirements rendered the selection process invalid.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the appointments of the Head Master and Assistant Teachers were found to be void ab initio due to the lack of essential qualifications and the flawed selection process.
JUDGMENT :
DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J.
On C.M. Application No.78457 of 2021
Herd.
This application seeks substitution of the legal heirs of Aditya Kumar, petitioner no.3 Application is allowed.
Necessary amendment to be carried out in the memo of parties during the course of the day.
On Memo of Writ Petition
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 3.12.2018 passed by the Director of Education (Basic), Government of Uttar Pradesh as well as the order dated 5.5.2012 passed by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Auraiya. Further prayer is for a Writ of Mandamus/direction to the opposite parties to accord approval to the appointment of petitioner nos.2 and 3 and pay their salary w.e.f. 24.12.2011 and 2812.2011 along with arrears of salary etc.
2. Petitioner no.1 is the committee of management of Sri Shanker Junior High School, Sirsani, Sahar, District Auraiya and petitioner nos.2 and 3 are claiming to have been appointed in the said Junior High School by the committee of management and are working in the said Junior High School on the post of Head Master and Assistant Teacher (Basic) from the date of their appointment.
3. The institution is recognized as Junior High School as per the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act and it is governed under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act, 1972 and the Rules and Regulations framed thereunder. It is said that the said Junior High School was established in the year 1982-83 and recognition was granted on 11.4.1983 for imparting education up to Class-VIII. The State Government granted grant-in-aid to the said Junior High School in the year 1998 and thus, the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Junior High School (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act, 1978 (for short ‘Act, 1978’) were made applicable to the teaching and non-teaching staff of the said Junior High School. The recruitment and conditions of services of Teachers are governed under the provisions of U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Services of Teachers) Rules, 1978 (for short ‘Rules, 1978’).
4. As per the averments made in the writ petition, the Government had sanctioned one post of Head Master, 8 Assistant Teachers, one clerk and 3 Class-IV posts in the said Junior High School. It is further said that on 30.6.2007, post of Head Master fell vacant in the High School due to retirement of Sri Jagdish Narain Agnihotri from the said post and, thereafter, two posts of Assistant Teachers fell vacant due to retirement of two teachers, namely, Vishnu Dutt Tripathi and Rajendra Prasad Agnihotri on 30.6.2007 and 30.6.2010 respectively. It is also said that management of the school had written various letters and reminders to the Basic Shiksha Adhikari to grant permission and send Observer for making appointment against the aforesaid vacant posts of Head Master and Assistant Teachers. When no action was taken by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, petitioner no.1 filed Writ-A No.25139 of 2010 before this Court at Allahabad. This Court disposed of the said writ petition vide order dated 6.5.2010, which reads as follow:-
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Petitioner before this Court claims to be Manager for Shree Shankar Junior High School, Sirsani, District Auraiya. He has made an application for grant by permission to initiate the process of selection on the post of Headmaster by making appropriate advertisement. It is stated that the post of Headmaster is lying vacant since July 2007. Similarly, there are other vacancies on the post of Assistant Teachers also.
Prayer so made is opposed by Shri S.K. Mishra, Advocate on the ground that the petitioner has been removed from the office of the Manager of the Institution and therefore he has no right to maintain the petition.
This Court is of the opinion that regular selection on th
The appointments were found to be void ab initio due to the lack of essential qualifications and the flawed selection process.
Valid appointments made under existing rules cannot be retroactively invalidated by later amendments or determinations of sanctioned strength.
The recruitment process for educational appointments must be conducted fairly, transparently, and in accordance with statutory provisions to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice and e....
The court established that the absence of a nominee from the DBEO in the selection committee invalidates the appointment process, and that the provisions of the Act 1921 apply to institutions upgrade....
The qualifications for appointment must be judged by the rules in force at the time of selection, not by subsequent amendments.
Point of law: If the District Basic Education Officer does not communicate his decision within one month from the date of receipt of the papers under clause (4), he shall be deemed to have accorded a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of the petitioner as an Assistant Teacher was made against a substantive vacancy, entitling the petitioner to regularization u....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.