IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Anand Venkatesh, J.
Mangalakshmi, W/o.Late Balakrishnan and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department and ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No.12028 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.13606 of 2025
Decided On : 07-04-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to no objection certificate requirement (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. procedural guidelines for patta issuance (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. previous court rulings negate noc requirement (Para 5) |
ORDER :
N.Anand Venkatesh, J.
This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of fifth respondent dated 04.03.2025 and for consequential direction to the fifth respondent to issue patta to the petitioners with respect to the subject property.
2. Heard Mr.A.Ilaya Perumal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader for respondents.
3. The request made by the petitioners seeking for patta has been rejected by the fifth respondent mainly on the ground that the patta can be issued only after getting 'No Objection Certificate' from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board.
4. The issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by earlier order of this Court dated 19.02.2025 in W.P.No.5387 of 2025 and relevant portions are extracted hereunder:
'3. A similar batch of writ petitions came to be filed before this Court and this Court passed an order dated 04.09.2017 made in WP.No.17484 to 17492 of 2017. For better understanding, the order is extracted hereunder:
“The petitioners have filed the above writ petitions to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent to process the petitioners' application dated 15.05.2017, 06.01.2016, 11.01.2016 and grant patta in respect of S.Nos.375, 373/2A respectively in Nerkundram Village, Maduravoyal Taluk, Tiruvallur District in favour of the petitioners without insisting No Objection Certificate from the second respondent within a time frame. 2. It is the case of the petitioners that originally Section 4(1) Notification was issued for acquisition of the lands on 11.06.1975 and 09.06.1978 in G.O.Rt.No.124 Housing, dated 08.05.1975 and G.O.Ms.Nos.996, 993, 994 Housing, dated 07.06.1978. Challenging the Notification issued under Section 4(1) and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, the land owner preferred writ petitions in W.P.Nos.8370 and 8371 of 1986 and the Division Bench of this Court, by order dated 21.01.1988 allowed the writ petitions and quashed the declaration under Section 6 of the Act and directed the authorities to conduct enquiry under Section 5A of the Act afresh.
3. Thereafter, the petitioner in W.P.No.8371 of 1986 preferred a writ petition in W.P.No.18379 of 1991 challenging Section 4(1) Notification dated 11.06.1995. This Court, by order dated 01.07.1999 quashed the Section 4(1) Notification dated 11.06.1975 and allowed the writ petition. In para 3 of the order passed in the said writ petition, this Court also recorded that the possession of the land was handed over to the Tamil Nadu Housing Board on 25.07.1986.
4. The petitioners, after their purchase from the original land owner, had applied for issuance of patta before the first respondent. The first respondent directed the petitioners to get No Objection Certificate from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board for the reason that the land was acquired by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that once Section 4(1) Notification has been quashed by this Court, the Housing Board has no right over the acquired lands. Admittedly, neither the Housing Board nor the State Government have challenged the orders passed in the earlier writ petitions. Therefore, according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the order passed in W.P.Nos.8370 and 8371 of 1986, dated 21.01.1988 and in W.P.No.18379 of 1991, dated 01.07.199 have become final.
6. Mr.Vivekavanan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Tamil Nadu Housing Board, submitted that the Housing Board had taken possession of the land, as early as on 25.07.1986 and also deposited the Award amount before the Civil Court. The learned Standing Counsel further submitted that Award was passed on 30.05.1986 in Award No.1 of 1986. In these circumstances, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Housin
AI
The court affirmed that once a land acquisition notification is quashed, no further objections, such as the need for an NOC from the Housing Board, can be imposed on issuing patta.
Once acquisition proceedings are quashed, authorities cannot require a No Objection Certificate from the Housing Board for issuing patta.
Once acquisition proceedings are quashed, authorities cannot require a No Objection Certificate from the Housing Board for issuing land patta.
Once acquisition proceedings are quashed, the authority cannot claim rights over the land, and administrative bodies must adhere to prior court rulings.
A petitioner cannot seek a No Objection Certificate for property already vested with a statutory body, lacking locus standi where prior judgments negate their claim.
Third-party purchasers of land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act do not possess an absolute right to 'No Objection Certificates', and the title of acquired land vests with the government, limit....
Land not acquired within five years under G.O.(Ms.)No.136 is eligible for release upon representations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.