IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
M/s. Asian Emu Farms - Appellant
Versus
State by the Inspector of Police, Coimbatore - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 167 of 2021, Crl. M.P. Nos. 6100, 13989 of 2023
Decided On : 17-04-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts related to the accused and fraudulent scheme (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the appellants (Para 3 , 4 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. court's observations on settlements and compliance (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final conclusion and order (Para 13) |
| 5. judgment set aside, acquittal of appellants (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This Criminal Appeal had been filed against the judgment dated 11.01.2021 passed in C.C. No. 17 of 2014 on the file of the learned Special Judge, Special Court under TNPID Act Cases, Coimbatore.
2. The brief facts, which are necessary for the disposal of this Criminal Appeal, are as follows:
2.1. According to the Inspector of Police, EOW-II, Coimbatore, the Accused No.1 viz., Asian Emu Farms was registered before the Registrar of Firms, Coimbatore under Reg. No.979/2011 on 04.08.2011. They were running their office at S-Block, 11-B, Thamilarasi Complex, Kovaipudur, Coimbatore. Accused-2 to Accused-6 are the partners of Accused-l Financial Establishment as per the Partnership Deed dated 10.07.2011, Accused-7 Paul retired from the said Accused-l firm on 20.08.2011 and one C. Sivan, Accused-8 was newly inducted as partner of the Accused-1 Firm. On 16.11.2011, the Accused-2 to Accused-7 have jointly opened a Current Account No.1294135000001572 with Karur Vysya Bank, Kovaipudur Branch, Coimbatore. The Accused Accused-2 to Accused-8 planned and worked together in a calculative manner and collected deposits from the public with a dishonest intention to cheat the depositors and swindle their deposit amounts. The Accused had induced the general public with the false promises of unrealizable returns and also assured to return the principal amount at the end of the term and collected deposits from them in fraudulent financial operation popularly known as "PONZI SCHEME". Further Accused-2 to Accused-8 canvassed and collected deposit amount under various plans viz.
(i) Under Plan-1, on deposit amount of Rs.2,00,000/-, the Company would pay an amount of Rs.8,000/- as monthly returns to every month for a period of 24 months and pay an amount of Rs.55,000/- as bonus for two years; they would build a shed in the depositors land and supply 8 Emu Chicks with full insurance coverage; they would supply necessary feed and medical assistance; the depositor has to grow the chicks for a period of 24 months and they would take back the grown up chicks and return the deposit amount to the depositor at the end of 24 months;
(ii) Under Plan-II, on deposit amount of Rs.1,50,000/-, the Company would pay an amount of Rs.6,500/- as monthly returns to every month for a period of 36 months and pay an amount of Rs.45,000/- as bonus for three years; they would build a shed in the depositors land and supply 6 Emu Chicks with full insurance coverage; they would supply necessary feed and medical assistance; the depositor has to grow the chicks for a period of 36 months and they would take back the grown up chicks and return the deposit amount to the depositor at the end of 36 months;
(iii) Under Plan-III, on deposit amount of Rs.1,50,000/-, the Company would pay an amount of Rs.7,000/- as monthly returns to every month for a period of 36 months and pay an amount of Rs.45,000/- as bonus for three years; they would build a shed in the depositors land and supply 6 Emu Chicks with full insurance coverage; they would supply necessary feed and medical assistance; the depositor has to grow the chicks for a period of 36 months and they would take back the grown up chicks and return the deposit amount to the depositor at the end of 36 months;
(iv) Under Plan-IV, on deposit amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, the Company would pay amount of Rs.5,000/- as monthly returns to every month for a period of 60 month; they would build a shed in the depositor's land and supply 4 Emu Chicks with full insurance coverage; they would supply necessary feed and medical assistance; the depositor hat to grow the chicks for a period of 60 months and they would take back the grow
The accused were acquitted after settling all dues to depositors, establishing that offences under the TNPID Act can be compounded post-settlement.
The court upheld convictions for financial fraud, emphasizing the fulfillment of evidentiary standards for proving deceit by defendants.
The court can annul a conviction and sentence under the TNPID Act if the parties reach a compromise and the entire amount due to depositors is paid, emphasizing the compensatory nature of the Act.
Conviction under the TNPID Act upheld due to proven fraudulent solicitation of deposits, despite later repayment of principal amounts.
Duping of public and financial fraud – Non-making out of offences under IPC cannot be equated with non-applicability of provisions of any specific law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.