SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3031

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R.Vijayakumar, J
P.Balamurugan – Appellant
Versus
Muthulakshmi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M.Prabu
For the Respondent: Mr. A.Srinivasan

ORDER :

R.Vijayakumar, J.

These revision petitions have been filed challenging the orders passed in I.A.No.14 of 2022 in RCOP.No. 8 of 2017 and I.A.No.15 of 2022 in RCOP.No.9 of 2017 on the file of the Rent Controller Cum District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti.

(A) Factual Background:

2.These Rent Control Petitions have been filed by the landlord namely Muthulakshmi and Muthukumaran as against their tenant namely Balamurugan and to evict him from two non-residential building bearing Door No.119E and Door No.119F.

3.As per averments in the Rent Control Petitions, the tenant has committed wilful default in payment of rent and therefore, he is liable to be evicted. Both the Rent Control Petitions were filed in the month of July and August 2017.

4.Pending Rent Control Proceedings, the landlord has sold the petition mentioned premises in both the Rent Control Petitions to third parties under a registered sale deed dated 01.01.2020. Therefore, the tenant had filed I.A.No.14 of 2022 and I.A.No.15 of 2022 under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C to reject the rent control petitions on the ground that the landlord has no locustandi to continue the eviction proceedings filed on the ground of wilful default after

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top