Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.R. SWAMINATHAN, M. JOTHIRAMAN
P. Marimuthu – Appellant
Versus
S.S. Prabhakaran – Respondent
JUDGEMENT :
(G.R. SWAMINATHAN, J.)
This appeal arises out of a suit for specific performance.
2.The plaintiff / Prabakaran entered into sale agreement on 25.07.2011 with the defendant / Subburaj. To specifically enforce the sale agreement, Prabakaran filed O.S.No.26 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Court, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur on 13.03.2013. His case was that the defendant agreed to sell the suit property measuring 12 acres and 72 cents in his favour for a sale consideration of Rs.41,23,000/-. According to him, a sum of Rs.10,50,000/- was paid as advance on 25.07.2011 and further a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- was paid on 10.10.2011. Since the defendant did not come forward to conclude the transaction, he filed the said suit.
3.The defendant filed written statement stating that the time for concluding the transaction ended on 11.11.2011. Hence, the defendant sent legal notice dated 15.12.2011 cancelling the agreement itself. The defendant questioned the plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform the contract. The defendant pleaded that the plaintiff failed to adhere to the terms of the contract. The defendant also claimed that the plaintiff had forfeited whatever ad
The doctrine of lis pendens applies to suits for specific performance, limiting rights of subsequent purchasers unless they are permitted to intervene. The court ruled that the trial court erred in d....
Lis pendens purchasers are not necessary or proper parties in a specific performance suit, as their absence does not impede the passing of an effective decree.
The court established that in specific performance cases, all parties with a direct interest must be included to ensure effective adjudication and uphold the doctrine of Us pendens.
A transferee pendente lite is entitled to be impleaded in specific performance suits to protect their interests, validating the need for comprehensive adjudication of rights over the property.
The doctrine of lis pendens prevents a subsequent purchaser from acquiring rights in property under litigation; such purchasers are not necessary parties to the suit.
A pendente lite purchaser can be added as a party to ongoing litigation to protect substantial interests, and such applications should typically be granted without prejudice.
(1) Appeal – Locus Standi – A stranger cannot be permitted to file an appeal in any proceedings unless he satisfies court that he falls within category of aggrieved persons.(2) Impleadment of transfe....
Point of Law : Presence of the transferee pendent lite is necessary for complete and effective adjudication of the suit and issues involved therein and the court below has exercised its discretion in....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
