SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3261

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, J
S.Sakthivel – Appellant
Versus
Dhananchejhian – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr.R.Rajarajan
For the Respondent: Mr.A.P.Sathyamurthy

JUDGMENT :

Challenging the decree and judgment of the trial Court decreeing the suit for specific performance, the present appeal has been filed by the unsuccessful defendants.

2. The parties are arrayed as per their own ranking before the trial Court.

3. The case of the plaintiff is that the defendants had executed an agreement for sale of the property and the agreement has also been registered for a total sale consideration of Rs. 15 lakhs on 19.11.2011 and received a sum of Rs.4 lakhs as an advance on the same day. It is agreed between the parties that the sale shall be completed within a period of 24 months. The plaintiff is always ready and willing to purchase property and approached the defendants repeatedly to produce original title deeds. However, the defendants have not produced the original documents. Therefore, the plaintiff issued a legal notice on 21.08.2023 which has been replied by the defendants contending that it is only a loan transaction. Hence, the suit.

4. It is the contention of the defendants that one Elumalai has borrowed a sum of Rs.4 lakhs under a promissory note dated 03.10.2011 from the plaintiff agreeing to return the said amount within a period of 24 month

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top