Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.DHANABAL, J
Dinesh @ Thinesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records pertaining to S.C.No.31 of 2025 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Court, Ramanathapuram, for the offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 324, 307, 506(ii) & 120-B of IPC, in Crime No. 81 of 2019 and quash the same.
2. According to the petitioner, based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the police has registered FIR in Cr.No.81 of 2019 for the offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 324, 307 & 506(ii) of IPC and subsequently altered the same into one under Sections 341, 294(b), 324, 307, 506(ii) & 120-B of IPC.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on both sides represented that during pendency of the case in S.C.No.31 of 2025, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.
4. Today, the defacto-complainant and the accused are present and the Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto- complainant represented that they entered into a compromise. A compromise memo, dated 10.02.2025 signed by the parties and their respective
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing the need to secure justice and prevent abuse of process, even for non-compoundable offences.
A court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties if it serves the ends of justice and the case does not involve serious crimes.
The power to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. can be exercised to prevent abuse of the process of law and in cases where the continuation of the criminal case would be an exerc....
The court can quash criminal proceedings and allow the compounding of offences based on a voluntary compromise, as per the principles established by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Compromise in non-compoundable matrimonial offences can be accepted to prevent injustice if the parties resolve their disputes, considering the nature of the offences.
A compromise between convict and complainant does not automatically quash a conviction under non-compoundable offences; judicial discretion is exercised only in rare cases to prevent abuse of justice....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that serious offences under Sections 307, 498-A, 34 of IPC, which have a significant impact on society, are non-compoundable and should not be quas....
The court affirmed that compromises post-conviction do not automatically quash convictions for non-compoundable offenses, but may be considered in appeals.
The High Court can quash FIRs for non-compoundable offences if a genuine compromise exists and public interest is not adversely affected.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the recognition of compromises in criminal disputes, the impact on society, and the applicability of legal provisions such as Section 320 Cr.P.C. a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
