NINALA JAYASURYA
Muthuchupalli Gangadhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ninala Jayasurya, J. - These applications are filed under Section 320(2) R/w Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Section 320(2) R/w Section 482 Cr.P.C., respectively, seeking permission to record Compromise and Compound the offences to quash the proceedings in P.R.C. No. 128 of 2021 on the learned VII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
2. The 2nd respondent/de facto complainant lodged a complaint against the petitioner/Accused in Cr. No. 525 of 2021 before the Station House Officer, Kancharapalaem Law & Order Police Station, Visakhapatnam City for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 417 and 420 of IPC and the said case is now pending before the Trial Court.
3. The petitioner/Accused and the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant are present and they are identified by their respective counsels.
4. A Joint Memo of Compromise is filed by both the parties, when terms of Joint Memo of compromise are explained in Telugu language they are admitted to be true and correct. It is submitted that petitioner/Accused & 2nd respondent/de facto complainant voluntarily entered into compromise, settled the matter outside the Court due to intervention of el
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.