Back
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr.Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
TVS Motor Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Controller of Patents & Designs, The Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building, G.S.T. Road, Guindy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.)
This appeal is directed against the order dated 31.05.2024 rejecting Indian Patent Application No.6617/CHE/2014 dated 26.12.2024 in respect of a claimed invention titled "VEHICLE MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF".
2. Pursuant to a request from the appellant, the first examination report was issued on 26.02.2020. In the said report, objections were raised inter alia on the ground of lack of invention step by citing two prior art documents (D1 and D2). The appellant replied to the FER on 26.02.2020. Hearing notice dated 05.03.2024 was issued thereafter and this was followed by a further hearing notice dated 03.04.2024. Pursuant to the hearing, the appellant also filed written submissions. It should be mentioned that the respondent cited an additional prior art, namely, Prior Art D3, in the subsequent hearing notice dated 03.04.2024. The order impugned herein was issued in these facts and circumstances.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant referred to the complete specification and submitted that the claimed invention relates to a vehicle monitoring system for use in two wheelers. He pointed out that the vehicle monitoring system enables the c
The claimed invention must demonstrate a technical contribution over prior art to qualify for patentability, and the impugned order lacked sufficient reasoning on this aspect.
The claimed invention presents an inventive step over prior art by simplifying complex sensor data communication, lacking obviousness per Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act.
The novelty of a patent must be established by clear prior art disclosures, with emphasis on systematic analysis distinguishing novelty from non-obviousness.
An invention must demonstrate novelty and an inventive step to be patentable; mere refinement of existing methods does not suffice.
The court established that a computer-related invention can be patentable if it demonstrates a technical effect that enhances system functionality, overcoming the exclusion of computer programs per s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a detailed analysis of the existing knowledge and how the subject invention lacks inventiveness in light of the prior art when ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of accurate references to prior art documents and the need to ensure a fair and accurate consideration of patent applications.
Passing of a reasoned and a speaking order is an integral part of the principle of audi alteram partem. The Controller must consider the existing knowledge and how a person skilled in the art would m....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
