SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3522

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
Kavitha Anand - Appellant 
Versus 
State of Tamil Nadu - Respondent 
W.P.No.35158 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.38070 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.2306 of 2025
Decided on : 07-02-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.G.R.Hari
For the Respondent:Mr.E.Sundaram Government Advocate, Mr.K.S.Jeyaganesan

The ART Act restricts assisted reproductive technology services to women aged 21 to 50, despite the general definition of 'Woman' lacking an upper age limit.

Headnote:(A) Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 - Section 2(e), 2(u), 21(g), 27 - Writ petition challenging rejection of request for ART services based on age - Court held that the definition of 'Woman' does not impose an upper age limit, but Section 21(g) restricts ART services to women aged 21 to 50 years - The Act creates a legal right for women within this age bracket to demand ART services, while those outside cannot enforce such a right. (Paras 2, 4, 10, 15)

(B) Legal Rights - The court emphasized that while the definition of 'Woman' lacks an upper age limit, the specific provisions of Section 21(g) impose a duty on ART clinics to provide services only to women within the specified age range. (Paras 4, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the rejection of her request to use donor gametes for ART services, arguing that the definition of 'Woman' under the ART Act does not limit age. The 7th respondent denied the request based on the age restriction in Section 21(g).

Findings of Court:
The court found no error in the rejection of the petitioner's request, affirming that the ART Act imposes an upper age limit for availing ART services.

Issues: The main issues were whether the definition of 'Woman' under the ART Act allows for ART services beyond the age of 50 and the validity of the age restrictions in Section 21(g).

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the specific provisions of the ART Act, particularly Section 21(g), take precedence over the general definition of 'Woman', thereby restricting ART services to women aged 21 to 50.

Result: Writ Petition dismissed.

ORDER :

The Writ Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the 7th respondent rejecting the representation of the petitioner dated 02.07.2024 requesting him to permit the petitioner to use gametes of donors and avail services under the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as 'ART Act' for the sake of brevity) by citing Section 21(g) of ART Act.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently contended that the word 'Woman' is defined under Section 2(u) of ART Act as any woman above the age of 21 years, who approaches an ART Clinic or ART Bank for obtaining the authorised services and hence, in the absence of any upper age limit for the word 'Woman' as defined under the Act, the 7th respondent committed a serious error in rejecting the request of the petitioner for availing ART services by citing her age. The learned counsel in support of his contention had taken this Court to definition of the word 'Woman' under Section 2(u) of ART Act and the definition of the expression 'commissioning couple' under Section 2(e) of ART Act and emphatically submitted that in the absence of upper age limit in the definition section, a restrictive meaning cannot be given to the word 'Woman' or expression 'commissioning couple' by excluding woman aged above 50 years. The learned counsel also submitted that under the sister legislation, the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, the expression 'intending woman' has been given restrictive meaning by prescribing upper age limit, however in ART Act, no such upper age limit is prescribed in the definition section. The learned counsel further submitted that as per the definition of the word 'Woman' under the Act, any woman above the age of 21 years is entitled to ask for services of ART Clinic or Bank and the 7th respondent erred in applying Section 21(g) of ART Act. He further submitted that Section 21(g) of the Act only makes it mandatory for the ART Clinic to apply ART services to a woman between the age of 21 years to 50 years and it does not mean woman above the age of 51 years is not entitled to seek services of ART.

3. In order to decide the issue raised by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in this writ petition, a reference to following provisions of the ART Act are essential.

“(i) Section 2(e) - 'Commissioning Couple' means an infertile married couple who approach an assisted reproductive technology clinic or assisted reproductive technology bank for obtaining the services authorised of the said clinic or bank.

(ii) Section 2(u) – 'Woman' means any woman above the age of twenty-one years who approaches an assisted reproductive technology clinic or assisted reproductive technology bank for obtaining the authorised services of the clinic or bank.

(iii) Section 21(g) the clinics shall apply the assisted reproductive technology services,-

(i) to a woman above the age of twenty-one years and below the age of fifty years;

(ii) to a man above the age of twenty-one years and below the age of fifty-five years;

(iv) Section 27. Sourcing of gametes by assisted reproductive technology banks. - (1) The screening of gamete donors, the collection, screening and storage of semen; and provision of oocyte donor, shall be done only by a bank registered as an independent entity under the provisions of this Act.

(2) The banks shall-

(a) obtain semen from males between twenty-one years of age and fifty-five years of age, both inclusive;

(b) obtain oocytes from females between twenty-three years of age and thirty-five years of age; and (c) examine the donors for such diseases, as may be prescribed.

(v) Clause 5(d) of Statement of Objects and Reasons of ART Act, reads as follows:-

5(d) to provide that the assisted reproductive technology services shall be available to a woman above the legal age of marriage and below the age of fifty years and a man above the legal age of marriage and below the age of fifty-five years.”

4. A perusal of Section 21(g) of ART

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top